SHRT vs. MSTZ
SHRT (Gotham Short Strategies ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SHRT returned -17.31% vs 299.04% for MSTZ. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHRT charges 1.35%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
SHRT vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHRT achieves a -15.36% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -27.52% return.
SHRT
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- 6M
- -11.10%
- YTD
- -15.36%
- 1Y
- -17.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ
- 1D
- 6.51%
- 1M
- 38.88%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -27.52%
- 1Y
- 299.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHRT vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | -15.36% | -0.91% | -6.21% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -27.52% | -38.95% | -94.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHRT and MSTZ is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHRT vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
SHRT
MSTZ
SHRT vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHRT | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.33 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 3.55 | -4.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.85 | 6.84 | -8.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHRT vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHRT drawdown since its inception was -27.84%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHRT and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHRT | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.84% | -99.38% | +71.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.19% | -84.89% | +63.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.09% | -97.53% | +73.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -94.55% | +85.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.53% | 43.95% | -34.42% |
Volatility
SHRT vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) is 5.37%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 55.03%. This indicates that SHRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHRT | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.37% | 55.03% | -49.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.94% | 134.45% | -122.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.02% | 148.58% | -134.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.97% | 170.73% | -157.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.97% | 170.73% | -157.76% |
SHRT vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHRT has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHRT vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
SHRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.85% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHRT and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (55.03%) compared to SHRT (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHRT dropped -27.84% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 299.04% vs -17.31% for SHRT. On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, SHRT has been the lower-risk option at 5.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 299.04% return vs -17.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for SHRT.
SHRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
They also come from different issuers: Gotham and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for SHRT and 1.05% for MSTZ.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHRT and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer