SHRT vs. MSTZ
SHRT (Gotham Short Strategies ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SHRT returned -21.72% vs 94.24% for MSTZ. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHRT charges 1.35%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
SHRT vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHRT achieves a -17.20% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -46.88% return.
SHRT
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -4.10%
- YTD
- -17.20%
- 6M
- -15.30%
- 1Y
- -21.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ
- 1D
- 14.02%
- 1M
- 86.49%
- YTD
- -46.88%
- 6M
- -23.06%
- 1Y
- 94.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHRT vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | -17.20% | -0.91% | -6.66% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -46.88% | -38.95% | -94.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHRT and MSTZ is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2024 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHRT vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
SHRT
MSTZ
SHRT vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHRT | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 1.23 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 1.12 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.09 | 2.35 | -4.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHRT | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.67 | 0.68 | -2.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.79 | -0.53 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
SHRT vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHRT drawdown since its inception was -25.98%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHRT and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHRT | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.98% | -99.36% | +73.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.73% | -84.89% | +62.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.74% | -98.14% | +72.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.12% | -94.39% | +86.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.40% | 40.30% | -29.90% |
Volatility
SHRT vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) is 4.29%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 37.49%. This indicates that SHRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHRT | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 37.49% | -33.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.96% | 125.82% | -114.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.04% | 140.34% | -127.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 170.37% | -157.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 170.37% | -157.59% |
SHRT vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHRT has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHRT vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
SHRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.85% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHRT and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (37.49%) compared to SHRT (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHRT dropped -25.98% vs MSTZ's -99.36%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 94.24% vs -21.72% for SHRT. On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, SHRT has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 94.24% return vs -21.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for SHRT.
SHRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
They also come from different issuers: Gotham and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for SHRT and 1.05% for MSTZ.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHRT and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer