SHPIX vs. ULPIX
SHPIX (ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund) and ULPIX (ProFunds UltraBull Fund) are both mutual funds - SHPIX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by ProFunds, while ULPIX is a Leveraged Equities fund managed by ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, SHPIX returned 8.91%/yr vs 22.85%/yr for ULPIX. At a correlation of -0.86, they often move in opposite directions. SHPIX charges 1.78%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for ULPIX.
Performance
SHPIX vs. ULPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHPIX achieves a -16.70% return, which is significantly lower than ULPIX's 12.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SHPIX has underperformed ULPIX with an annualized return of 8.91%, while ULPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.85% annualized return.
SHPIX
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -3.54%
- YTD
- -16.70%
- 6M
- -14.43%
- 1Y
- -26.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.98%
- 5Y*
- 48.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
ULPIX
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 12.68%
- 6M
- 9.80%
- 1Y
- 38.57%
- 3Y*
- 31.58%
- 5Y*
- 16.50%
- 10Y*
- 22.85%
SHPIX vs. ULPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPIX ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund | -16.70% | -9.61% | 83.27% | 344.97% | 16.39% | -19.78% | -31.60% | -20.89% | 9.96% | -14.49% |
ULPIX ProFunds UltraBull Fund | 12.68% | 25.47% | 38.03% | 45.59% | -39.16% | 59.28% | 19.12% | 62.17% | -15.02% | 42.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHPIX and ULPIX is -0.79, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2003 | -0.86 |
The correlation between SHPIX and ULPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.86 to -0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHPIX vs. ULPIX — Risk / Return Rank
SHPIX
ULPIX
SHPIX vs. ULPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund (SHPIX) and ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHPIX | ULPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.29 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 2.29 | -3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.74 | 9.69 | -11.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHPIX vs. ULPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHPIX drawdown since its inception was -96.86%, which is greater than ULPIX's maximum drawdown of -89.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPIX and ULPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHPIX | ULPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.86% | -89.68% | -7.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.36% | -18.30% | -10.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.16% | -36.59% | -4.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.16% | -46.92% | +5.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.45% | -59.41% | -11.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.84% | -6.70% | -69.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.99% | -33.77% | -41.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.08% | 4.31% | +11.77% |
Volatility
SHPIX vs. ULPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund (SHPIX) is 6.44%, while ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) has a volatility of 9.79%. This indicates that SHPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ULPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHPIX | ULPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 9.79% | -3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.36% | 19.84% | -5.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.69% | 25.09% | -5.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 189.02% | 34.12% | +154.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 134.68% | 35.48% | +99.20% |
SHPIX vs. ULPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than ULPIX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHPIX vs. ULPIX - Dividend Comparison
SHPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.23%, more than ULPIX's 8.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPIX ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund | 33.23% | 5.70% | 0.00% | 17.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 0.00% |
ULPIX ProFunds UltraBull Fund | 8.09% | 9.11% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 10.36% | 5.62% | 12.74% | 0.42% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHPIX and ULPIX have a correlation of -0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ULPIX has higher volatility (9.79%) compared to SHPIX (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHPIX dropped -96.86% vs ULPIX's -89.68%.
ULPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHPIX and ULPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer