SHPIX vs. UHPIX
SHPIX (ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund) and UHPIX (ProFunds UltraShort China) are both Inverse Equities funds from ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, SHPIX returned 9.15%/yr vs -30.42%/yr for UHPIX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.78% expense ratio.
Performance
SHPIX vs. UHPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHPIX achieves a -16.89% return, which is significantly lower than UHPIX's 49.76% return. Over the past 10 years, SHPIX has outperformed UHPIX with an annualized return of 9.15%, while UHPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -30.42% annualized return.
SHPIX
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- -16.89%
- 6M
- -14.24%
- 1Y
- -28.65%
- 3Y*
- 9.00%
- 5Y*
- 46.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.15%
UHPIX
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- 22.01%
- YTD
- 49.76%
- 6M
- 54.16%
- 1Y
- 10.70%
- 3Y*
- -21.86%
- 5Y*
- -24.20%
- 10Y*
- -30.42%
SHPIX vs. UHPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPIX ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund | -16.89% | -9.61% | 83.27% | 344.97% | 16.39% | -19.78% | -31.60% | -20.89% | 9.96% | -14.49% |
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 49.76% | -49.82% | -29.87% | -26.13% | -63.62% | 94.89% | -64.76% | -43.34% | 39.47% | -57.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHPIX and UHPIX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2008 | 0.59 |
The correlation between SHPIX and UHPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHPIX vs. UHPIX — Risk / Return Rank
SHPIX
UHPIX
SHPIX vs. UHPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund (SHPIX) and ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHPIX | UHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.09 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 0.29 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.71 | 0.51 | -2.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHPIX vs. UHPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHPIX drawdown since its inception was -96.86%, roughly equal to the maximum UHPIX drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPIX and UHPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHPIX | UHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.86% | -99.98% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.89% | -45.52% | +17.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.69% | -80.96% | +40.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.69% | -96.64% | +55.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.45% | -98.81% | +28.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.90% | -99.95% | +24.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.99% | -93.41% | +18.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.68% | 26.07% | -9.39% |
Volatility
SHPIX vs. UHPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund (SHPIX) is 6.73%, while ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) has a volatility of 11.70%. This indicates that SHPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UHPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHPIX | UHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 11.70% | -4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.36% | 38.02% | -23.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.65% | 52.65% | -33.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 188.94% | 82.95% | +105.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 134.61% | 228.50% | -93.89% |
SHPIX vs. UHPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SHPIX and UHPIX have an expense ratio of 1.78%.
Dividends
SHPIX vs. UHPIX - Dividend Comparison
SHPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.30%, more than UHPIX's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPIX ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund | 33.30% | 5.70% | 0.00% | 17.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.85% |
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 2.87% | 4.29% | 0.00% | 3.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHPIX and UHPIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UHPIX has higher volatility (11.70%) compared to SHPIX (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHPIX dropped -96.86% vs UHPIX's -99.98%.
UHPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHPIX and UHPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer