SHOC vs. RSNRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX).
SHOC is a passively managed fund by Strive that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 5, 2022. RSNRX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Nov 14, 1995.
Performance
SHOC vs. RSNRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SHOC vs. RSNRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 7.67% | 49.91% | 16.74% | 61.97% | -1.17% |
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund | 16.87% | 69.60% | 15.94% | -8.64% | 3.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHOC achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly lower than RSNRX's 16.87% return.
SHOC
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- YTD
- 7.67%
- 6M
- 15.88%
- 1Y
- 85.73%
- 3Y*
- 34.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSNRX
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- 107.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.41%
- 5Y*
- 30.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SHOC vs. RSNRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHOC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than RSNRX's 1.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SHOC vs. RSNRX — Risk / Return Rank
SHOC
RSNRX
SHOC vs. RSNRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHOC | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 4.08 | -1.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.87 | 4.47 | -1.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.66 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.59 | 7.33 | -1.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.55 | 27.20 | -7.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHOC | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 4.08 | -1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.29 | +0.78 |
Correlation
The correlation between SHOC and RSNRX is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SHOC vs. RSNRX - Dividend Comparison
SHOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than RSNRX's 3.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 0.22% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.65% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund | 3.75% | 4.38% | 1.65% | 2.36% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
Drawdowns
SHOC vs. RSNRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHOC drawdown since its inception was -37.54%, smaller than the maximum RSNRX drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHOC and RSNRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHOC | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.54% | -89.73% | +52.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.48% | -14.36% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -84.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.58% | -0.65% | -6.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -26.07% | +18.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 3.87% | +0.55% |
Volatility
SHOC vs. RSNRX - Volatility Comparison
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) has a higher volatility of 11.63% compared to Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) at 6.66%. This indicates that SHOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSNRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SHOC | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.63% | 6.66% | +4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.06% | 19.24% | +5.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.01% | 26.79% | +11.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.07% | 25.47% | +9.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.07% | 31.80% | +3.27% |