PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHNY vs. NUGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHNY vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHNY achieves a -14.45% return, which is significantly higher than NUGT's -16.05% return.


SHNY

1D
-3.20%
1M
-7.37%
YTD
-14.45%
6M
-10.44%
1Y
49.39%
3Y*
59.66%
5Y*
10Y*

NUGT

1D
-6.64%
1M
-4.13%
YTD
-16.05%
6M
-6.29%
1Y
97.46%
3Y*
60.96%
5Y*
16.32%
10Y*
-8.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHNY vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SHNY
MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN
-14.45%214.54%50.30%12.52%
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares
-16.05%425.05%2.89%14.64%

Correlation

The correlation between SHNY and NUGT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2023

0.79

The correlation between SHNY and NUGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHNY vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHNY
SHNY Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SHNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHNY Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SHNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHNY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

NUGT
NUGT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHNY vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHNYNUGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.23

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

1.83

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.93

4.18

-2.25

SHNY vs. NUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the NUGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHNY and NUGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHNYNUGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

1.09

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

-0.33

+1.35

Drawdowns

SHNY vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHNY drawdown since its inception was -54.99%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHNY and NUGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHNYNUGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.99%

-99.97%

+44.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.99%

-53.58%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.99%

-53.58%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.99%

-99.80%

+44.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-91.52%

+76.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.66%

23.39%

+2.27%

Volatility

SHNY vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) is 16.40%, while Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT) has a volatility of 30.32%. This indicates that SHNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHNYNUGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.40%

30.32%

-13.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.87%

75.18%

-4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.80%

90.01%

-11.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.36%

71.96%

-13.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.36%

87.90%

-29.54%

SHNY vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHNY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHNY vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison

SHNY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NUGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares
0.36%0.22%1.79%1.67%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.63%0.57%
SHNY
MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHNY and NUGT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUGT has higher volatility (30.32%) compared to SHNY (16.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHNY dropped -54.99% vs NUGT's -99.97%.

On 3-year performance, NUGT leads with 60.96% vs 59.66% for SHNY. On fees, SHNY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SHNY has been the lower-risk option at 16.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NUGT has performed better with a 60.96% return vs 59.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHNY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for NUGT.

NUGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for SHNY.

SHNY is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while NUGT is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SHNY and 1.23% for NUGT.

NUGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHNY and NUGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer