SHNY vs. FNGD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SHNY (MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN) and FNGD (MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - SHNY is a Leveraged Commodities fund managed by BMO, while FNGD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (-300%). Over the past 3 years, SHNY returned 49.33%/yr vs -65.49%/yr for FNGD. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

SHNY vs. FNGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHNY achieves a -34.20% return, which is significantly lower than FNGD's -27.13% return.

SHNY

• 1D: -5.70%
• 1M: -27.06%
• YTD: -34.20%
• 6M: -42.91%
• 1Y: 14.03%
• 3Y*: 49.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNGD

• 1D: 7.44%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: -27.13%
• 6M: -23.35%
• 1Y: -49.41%
• 3Y*: -65.49%
• 5Y*: -62.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHNY vs. FNGD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SHNY MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN	-34.20%	214.54%	50.30%	10.98%
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-27.13%	-61.42%	-76.57%	-80.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SHNY and FNGD is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2023	-0.08

The correlation between SHNY and FNGD shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to -0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SHNY vs. FNGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHNY

SHNY Risk / Return Rank: 13
SHNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
SHNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
SHNY Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SHNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
SHNY Martin Ratio Rank: 11

FNGD

FNGD Risk / Return Rank: 3
FNGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FNGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FNGD Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FNGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FNGD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHNY vs. FNGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHNY	FNGD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.17	-0.76	+0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	-1.00	+1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	0.89	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.22	-0.75	+0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.49	-1.52	+2.00

SHNY vs. FNGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is higher than the FNGD Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHNY and FNGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SHNY vs. FNGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHNY drawdown since its inception was -65.54%, smaller than the maximum FNGD drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHNY and FNGD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHNY	FNGD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.54%	-100.00%	+34.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.54%	-65.92%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.54%	-97.35%	+31.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-99.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.38%	-100.00%	+34.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.65%	-87.30%	+71.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.98%	34.15%	-5.17%

Volatility

SHNY vs. FNGD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) is 24.50%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) has a volatility of 33.07%. This indicates that SHNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHNY	FNGD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.50%	33.07%	-8.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	74.44%	53.22%	+21.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	81.62%	65.50%	+16.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.25%	89.67%	-30.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.25%	91.30%	-32.05%

SHNY vs. FNGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SHNY and FNGD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

SHNY vs. FNGD - Dividend Comparison

Neither SHNY nor FNGD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHNY and FNGD in my portfolio?

SHNY and FNGD have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHNY or FNGD?

FNGD has higher volatility (33.07%) compared to SHNY (24.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHNY dropped -65.54% vs FNGD's -100.00%.

Which ETF is better, SHNY or FNGD?

On 3-year performance, SHNY leads with 49.33% vs -65.49% for FNGD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SHNY has been the lower-risk option at 24.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHNY or FNGD?

Over the 3-year period, SHNY has performed better with a 49.33% return vs -65.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHNY or FNGD?

SHNY and FNGD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHNY or FNGD?

SHNY and FNGD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SHNY and FNGD?

SHNY is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while FNGD is Leveraged Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.