PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHLD vs. UTEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHLD vs. UTEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) and US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHLD achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than UTEN's -0.49% return.


SHLD

1D
-2.04%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
-1.50%
6M
-1.03%
1Y
8.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UTEN

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.36%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
2.29%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHLD vs. UTEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-1.50%74.16%35.03%12.89%
UTEN
US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF
-0.49%7.82%-1.67%4.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SHLD and UTEN is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHLD vs. UTEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

UTEN
UTEN Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
UTEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTEN Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
UTEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTEN Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHLD vs. UTEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) and US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHLDUTENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.11

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

0.76

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.28

2.16

-0.88

SHLD vs. UTEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the UTEN Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHLD and UTEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHLD vs. UTEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHLD drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, which is greater than UTEN's maximum drawdown of -13.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHLD and UTEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHLDUTENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.10%

-13.36%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.10%

-4.57%

-15.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.20%

-2.85%

-15.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.34%

-4.81%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.12%

1.60%

+6.52%

Volatility

SHLD vs. UTEN - Volatility Comparison

Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a higher volatility of 9.05% compared to US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) at 1.79%. This indicates that SHLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHLDUTENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.05%

1.79%

+7.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.94%

3.74%

+16.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.55%

5.18%

+19.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.29%

8.04%

+13.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.29%

8.04%

+13.25%

SHLD vs. UTEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHLD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than UTEN's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHLD vs. UTEN - Dividend Comparison

SHLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than UTEN's 4.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.56%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%
UTEN
US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF
4.04%4.11%4.13%3.62%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHLD and UTEN have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (9.05%) compared to UTEN (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHLD dropped -20.10% vs UTEN's -13.36%.

On 1-year performance, SHLD leads with 8.26% vs 3.90% for UTEN. On fees, UTEN is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, UTEN has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SHLD has performed better with a 8.26% return vs 3.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTEN is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHLD.

UTEN has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 0.56% for SHLD.

SHLD is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while UTEN is Government Bonds. SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index, while UTEN tracks ICE BofA Current 10 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Global X and US Benchmark Series. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SHLD and 0.15% for UTEN.

UTEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHLD and UTEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer