PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHIP vs. QTTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SHIP vs. QTTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) and Q32 Bio Inc (QTTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHIP achieves a 66.72% return, which is significantly lower than QTTB's 281.02% return.


SHIP

1D
3.49%
1M
0.13%
YTD
66.72%
6M
66.52%
1Y
140.70%
3Y*
59.02%
5Y*
12.44%
10Y*
-42.24%

QTTB

1D
6.30%
1M
118.10%
YTD
281.02%
6M
317.49%
1Y
716.13%
3Y*
-7.47%
5Y*
-37.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHIP vs. QTTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
66.72%38.48%-3.81%61.04%-36.53%70.83%-93.89%-92.71%-44.14%
QTTB
Q32 Bio Inc
281.02%-3.49%-68.57%-51.75%-65.38%-67.76%-45.46%-7.42%-2.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SHIP and QTTB is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SHIP:

$315.99M

QTTB:

$178.31M

EPS

SHIP:

$1.00

QTTB:

$3.20

PE Ratio

SHIP:

15.12

QTTB:

3.96

PS Ratio

SHIP:

1.98

QTTB:

3.01

PB Ratio

SHIP:

1.12

QTTB:

3.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

SHIP:

$158.10M

QTTB:

$53.74M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SHIP:

$62.63M

QTTB:

$53.56M

EBITDA (TTM)

SHIP:

$78.01M

QTTB:

$21.97M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHIP vs. QTTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHIP
SHIP Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SHIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SHIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

QTTB
QTTB Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
QTTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTTB Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
QTTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTTB Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHIP vs. QTTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) and Q32 Bio Inc (QTTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHIPQTTBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.59

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.63

14.14

-6.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.71

26.73

-8.02

SHIP vs. QTTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHIP Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is comparable to the QTTB Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHIP and QTTB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHIP vs. QTTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHIP drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum QTTB drawdown of -99.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHIP and QTTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHIPQTTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-99.75%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.56%

-51.14%

+32.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.61%

-97.31%

+39.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.11%

-99.13%

+30.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.98%

-97.68%

-2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.57%

-72.99%

-13.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.55%

26.99%

-19.44%

Volatility

SHIP vs. QTTB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) is 16.61%, while Q32 Bio Inc (QTTB) has a volatility of 70.95%. This indicates that SHIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHIPQTTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.61%

70.95%

-54.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.56%

95.13%

-60.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.31%

195.62%

-152.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.69%

123.87%

-72.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

98.58%

105.72%

-7.14%

Dividends

SHIP vs. QTTB - Dividend Comparison

SHIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, while QTTB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
QTTB
Q32 Bio Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
2.84%3.58%10.58%1.28%25.23%

Financials

SHIP vs. QTTB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. and Q32 Bio Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-20.00M0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M20222023202420252026
49.42M
0
(SHIP) Total Revenue
(QTTB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SHIP and QTTB have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTTB has higher volatility (70.95%) compared to SHIP (16.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHIP dropped -100.00% vs QTTB's -99.75%.

QTTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 3.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHIP and QTTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer