SHIP vs. MU
SHIP (Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. SHIP operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, SHIP returned -42.42%/yr vs 55.26%/yr for MU. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SHIP vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHIP achieves a 61.65% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 267.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SHIP has underperformed MU with an annualized return of -42.42%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 55.26% annualized return.
SHIP
- 1D
- -3.67%
- 1M
- -2.91%
- YTD
- 61.65%
- 6M
- 61.63%
- 1Y
- 137.36%
- 3Y*
- 57.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.44%
- 10Y*
- -42.42%
MU
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 39.62%
- YTD
- 267.52%
- 6M
- 266.04%
- 1Y
- 721.69%
- 3Y*
- 153.39%
- 5Y*
- 67.30%
- 10Y*
- 55.26%
SHIP vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHIP Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. | 61.65% | 38.48% | -3.81% | 61.04% | -36.53% | 70.83% | -93.89% | -92.71% | -51.66% | -9.57% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 267.52% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHIP and MU is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2007 | 0.14 |
The correlation between SHIP and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SHIP:
$306.39M
MU:
$1.20T
SHIP:
$1.00
MU:
$44.42
SHIP:
14.66
MU:
23.61
SHIP:
0.04
MU:
0.09
SHIP:
1.92
MU:
13.20
SHIP:
1.09
MU:
11.89
SHIP:
$158.10M
MU:
$90.27B
SHIP:
$62.63M
MU:
$65.51B
SHIP:
$78.01M
MU:
$44.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHIP vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
SHIP
MU
SHIP vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHIP | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.74 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.44 | 24.07 | -16.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.13 | 91.01 | -72.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHIP vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHIP drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHIP and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHIP | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -98.25% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.56% | -30.28% | +11.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.61% | -57.63% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.11% | -57.63% | -11.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | -57.63% | -42.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -13.44% | -86.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.58% | -58.12% | -28.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.61% | 8.05% | -0.44% |
Volatility
SHIP vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) is 16.70%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 37.17%. This indicates that SHIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHIP | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.70% | 37.17% | -20.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.71% | 59.83% | -25.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.38% | 72.70% | -29.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.52% | 54.00% | -2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 98.56% | 50.43% | +48.13% |
Dividends
SHIP vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
SHIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
SHIP Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. | 2.93% | 3.58% | 10.58% | 1.28% | 25.23% | 0.00% |
Financials
SHIP vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SHIP vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
SHIP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 25.59M and revenue of 49.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
SHIP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 18.53M and revenue of 49.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.5%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.
SHIP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 12.31M and revenue of 49.42M, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SHIP and MU have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (37.17%) compared to SHIP (16.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHIP dropped -100.00% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.04 vs 3.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHIP and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer