SHGTX vs. CTCAX
SHGTX (Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund) and CTCAX (Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A) are both Technology Equities funds from Columbia. Over the past 10 years, SHGTX returned 28.01%/yr vs 24.55%/yr for CTCAX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SHGTX charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for CTCAX.
Performance
SHGTX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHGTX achieves a 52.60% return, which is significantly higher than CTCAX's 24.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SHGTX has outperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 28.01%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 24.55% annualized return.
SHGTX
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 52.60%
- 6M
- 49.84%
- 1Y
- 102.06%
- 3Y*
- 44.15%
- 5Y*
- 24.24%
- 10Y*
- 28.01%
CTCAX
- 1D
- -4.94%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 24.58%
- 6M
- 23.17%
- 1Y
- 46.50%
- 3Y*
- 32.90%
- 5Y*
- 18.06%
- 10Y*
- 24.55%
SHGTX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHGTX Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund | 52.60% | 35.09% | 26.04% | 45.28% | -31.70% | 38.60% | 45.56% | 54.92% | -8.70% | 34.52% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 24.58% | 24.78% | 31.39% | 56.46% | -34.81% | 22.73% | 49.46% | 43.91% | -1.48% | 42.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHGTX and CTCAX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2002 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SHGTX and CTCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHGTX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank
SHGTX
CTCAX
SHGTX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHGTX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.35 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.67 | 3.46 | +5.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.91 | 12.28 | +18.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHGTX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHGTX drawdown since its inception was -77.47%, which is greater than CTCAX's maximum drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHGTX and CTCAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHGTX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.47% | -61.04% | -16.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.45% | -14.43% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.90% | -26.67% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.17% | -39.55% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.17% | -39.55% | -3.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.64% | -5.66% | +2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.90% | -10.66% | -14.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 4.06% | -0.58% |
Volatility
SHGTX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX) is 12.17%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 12.82%. This indicates that SHGTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHGTX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.17% | 12.82% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.03% | 20.01% | +2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.04% | 23.96% | +4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.83% | 26.48% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 25.06% | +1.88% |
SHGTX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHGTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHGTX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison
SHGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, more than CTCAX's 2.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 2.64% | 3.29% | 1.08% | 2.36% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 0.91% | 2.55% | 5.82% | 3.52% | 0.36% | 1.80% |
SHGTX Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund | 5.54% | 8.45% | 14.04% | 6.22% | 3.94% | 11.77% | 9.92% | 10.26% | 12.75% | 7.25% | 8.13% | 8.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, SHGTX and CTCAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CTCAX has higher volatility (12.82%) compared to SHGTX (12.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHGTX dropped -77.47% vs CTCAX's -61.04%.
SHGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.85 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHGTX and CTCAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer