PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHGTX vs. CTCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHGTX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHGTX achieves a 52.60% return, which is significantly higher than CTCAX's 24.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SHGTX has outperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 28.01%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 24.55% annualized return.


SHGTX

1D
-3.56%
1M
4.21%
YTD
52.60%
6M
49.84%
1Y
102.06%
3Y*
44.15%
5Y*
24.24%
10Y*
28.01%

CTCAX

1D
-4.94%
1M
2.57%
YTD
24.58%
6M
23.17%
1Y
46.50%
3Y*
32.90%
5Y*
18.06%
10Y*
24.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHGTX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHGTX
Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund
52.60%35.09%26.04%45.28%-31.70%38.60%45.56%54.92%-8.70%34.52%
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
24.58%24.78%31.39%56.46%-34.81%22.73%49.46%43.91%-1.48%42.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SHGTX and CTCAX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2002

0.93

The correlation between SHGTX and CTCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHGTX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHGTX
SHGTX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SHGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SHGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

CTCAX
CTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
CTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHGTX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHGTXCTCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.35

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.67

3.46

+5.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.91

12.28

+18.63

SHGTX vs. CTCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHGTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.85, which is higher than the CTCAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHGTX and CTCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHGTX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHGTX drawdown since its inception was -77.47%, which is greater than CTCAX's maximum drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHGTX and CTCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHGTXCTCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.47%

-61.04%

-16.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.45%

-14.43%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.90%

-26.67%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.17%

-39.55%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.17%

-39.55%

-3.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

-5.66%

+2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.90%

-10.66%

-14.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

4.06%

-0.58%

Volatility

SHGTX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX) is 12.17%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 12.82%. This indicates that SHGTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHGTXCTCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.17%

12.82%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.03%

20.01%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.04%

23.96%

+4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.83%

26.48%

+1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.94%

25.06%

+1.88%

SHGTX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHGTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHGTX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison

SHGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, more than CTCAX's 2.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
2.64%3.29%1.08%2.36%3.53%4.15%0.91%2.55%5.82%3.52%0.36%1.80%
SHGTX
Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund
5.54%8.45%14.04%6.22%3.94%11.77%9.92%10.26%12.75%7.25%8.13%8.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, SHGTX and CTCAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CTCAX has higher volatility (12.82%) compared to SHGTX (12.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHGTX dropped -77.47% vs CTCAX's -61.04%.

SHGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.85 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHGTX and CTCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer