SHEH vs. PIPE
SHEH (Shell plc ADRhedged ETF) and PIPE (Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. SHEH is passively managed, while PIPE is actively managed. Over the past year, SHEH returned 18.17% vs 33.29% for PIPE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHEH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PIPE.
Performance
SHEH vs. PIPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHEH achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly lower than PIPE's 28.78% return.
SHEH
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- 6M
- 16.82%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PIPE
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 30.39%
- YTD
- 28.78%
- 1Y
- 33.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHEH vs. PIPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SHEH Shell plc ADRhedged ETF | 12.47% | 12.63% |
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 28.78% | 6.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHEH and PIPE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHEH vs. PIPE — Risk / Return Rank
SHEH
PIPE
SHEH vs. PIPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shell plc ADRhedged ETF (SHEH) and Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHEH | PIPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.39 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 4.56 | -3.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.99 | 11.06 | -8.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHEH vs. PIPE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHEH drawdown since its inception was -17.53%, which is greater than PIPE's maximum drawdown of -15.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHEH and PIPE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHEH | PIPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.53% | -15.69% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.53% | -7.33% | -10.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.29% | -2.98% | -10.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -4.03% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.10% | 3.02% | +3.08% |
Volatility
SHEH vs. PIPE - Volatility Comparison
Shell plc ADRhedged ETF (SHEH) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) at 5.58%. This indicates that SHEH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIPE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHEH | PIPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 5.58% | +1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.39% | 11.59% | +5.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.50% | 14.78% | +5.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 18.72% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 18.72% | +1.77% |
SHEH vs. PIPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHEH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than PIPE's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHEH vs. PIPE - Dividend Comparison
SHEH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than PIPE's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.69% | 3.74% |
SHEH Shell plc ADRhedged ETF | 2.07% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHEH and PIPE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHEH has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to PIPE (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHEH dropped -17.53% vs PIPE's -15.69%.
On 1-year performance, PIPE leads with 33.29% vs 18.17% for SHEH. On fees, SHEH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PIPE has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PIPE has performed better with a 33.29% return vs 18.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHEH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PIPE.
PIPE has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 2.07% for SHEH.
They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SHEH and 0.75% for PIPE.
PIPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHEH and PIPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer