SHE vs. RFDA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SHE (SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF) and RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SHE is passively managed, while RFDA is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SHE returned 12.27%/yr vs 13.32%/yr for RFDA. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SHE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RFDA.

Performance

SHE vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHE achieves a 17.65% return, which is significantly higher than RFDA's 14.14% return. Over the past 10 years, SHE has underperformed RFDA with an annualized return of 12.27%, while RFDA has yielded a comparatively higher 13.32% annualized return.

SHE

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: 14.53%
• YTD: 17.65%
• 1Y: 27.23%
• 3Y*: 20.92%
• 5Y*: 9.79%
• 10Y*: 12.27%
• ALL TIME*: 12.72%

RFDA

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.66%
• 6M: 12.44%
• YTD: 14.14%
• 1Y: 26.35%
• 3Y*: 17.71%
• 5Y*: 12.90%
• 10Y*: 13.32%
• ALL TIME*: 13.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	$102.21K	$102.34K	$118.80K
SHE SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF	$460.23K	$379.38K	$467.51K

SHE vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SHE SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF	17.65%	15.50%	23.35%	22.37%	-21.73%	15.17%	17.93%	23.63%	-3.48%	19.56%
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	14.14%	16.42%	20.12%	16.98%	-8.58%	25.94%	11.26%	27.15%	-9.27%	19.86%

Correlation

The correlation between SHE and RFDA is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2016	0.84

The correlation between SHE and RFDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.85 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SHE vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SHE	RFDA
Technology	37.3%	15.4%
Financial Services	11.7%	18.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	8.1%
Industrials	9.2%	9.3%
Healthcare	9.2%	12.2%
Communication Services	9.1%	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	7.1%
Energy	3.0%	11.1%
Utilities	2.2%	4.9%
Real Estate	1.8%	5.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

SHE vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SHE

SHE Risk / Return Rank: 81
SHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
SHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
SHE Omega Ratio Rank: 79
SHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SHE Martin Ratio Rank: 83

RFDA

RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 89
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 86
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SHE vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHE	RFDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	2.07	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	2.85	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.38	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	4.47	-1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.21	15.99	-4.78

SHE vs. RFDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHE Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the RFDA Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHE and RFDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SHE vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHE drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, roughly equal to the maximum RFDA drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHE and RFDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHE	RFDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.80%	-34.60%	-1.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.54%	-5.45%	-3.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.07%	-19.35%	+2.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.69%	-19.35%	-12.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.80%	-34.60%	-1.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.17%	-0.84%	-1.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.25%	-3.70%	-2.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.31%	1.52%	+0.79%

Volatility

SHE vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) at 2.85%. This indicates that SHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHE	RFDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.55%	2.85%	+0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.07%	8.65%	+2.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.70%	11.76%	+1.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.30%	15.72%	+1.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.02%	16.84%	+1.18%

SHE vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

SHE vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison

SHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than RFDA's 1.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	1.77%	1.89%	2.23%	2.68%	3.57%	1.44%	1.62%	1.87%	2.44%	1.90%	0.98%
SHE SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF	1.08%	1.18%	1.14%	1.37%	1.54%	0.99%	1.24%	1.91%	7.39%	5.37%	6.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHE and RFDA in my portfolio?

SHE and RFDA have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHE or RFDA?

SHE has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to RFDA (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHE dropped -35.80% vs RFDA's -34.60%.

Which ETF is better, SHE or RFDA?

On 10-year performance, RFDA leads with 13.32% vs 12.27% for SHE. On fees, SHE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHE or RFDA?

Over the 10-year period, RFDA has performed better with a 13.32% return vs 12.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHE or RFDA?

SHE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHE or RFDA?

RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.08% for SHE.

What is the main difference between SHE and RFDA?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SHE and 0.52% for RFDA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.