SHE vs. QUS
SHE (SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from State Street - SHE tracks the SSGA Gender Diversity (TR) while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SHE returned 12.83%/yr vs 13.67%/yr for QUS. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SHE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
SHE vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHE achieves a 19.56% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 6.67% return. Over the past 10 years, SHE has underperformed QUS with an annualized return of 12.83%, while QUS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.67% annualized return.
SHE
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 10.08%
- YTD
- 19.56%
- 6M
- 21.08%
- 1Y
- 31.32%
- 3Y*
- 24.28%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
QUS
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 6.67%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 17.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.67%
SHE vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHE SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF | 19.56% | 15.50% | 23.35% | 22.37% | -21.73% | 15.17% | 17.93% | 23.63% | -3.48% | 19.56% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 6.67% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -14.15% | 26.72% | 12.40% | 32.45% | -3.66% | 21.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHE and QUS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2016 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SHE and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
SHE vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SHE
QUS
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SHE
QUS
Financial Services
SHE
QUS
Communication Services
SHE
QUS
Industrials
SHE
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
SHE
QUS
Healthcare
SHE
QUS
Consumer Defensive
SHE
QUS
Energy
SHE
QUS
Utilities
SHE
QUS
Real Estate
SHE
QUS
Basic Materials
SHE
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHE vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
SHE
QUS
SHE vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHE | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | 1.95 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.43 | 2.81 | +0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.35 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 2.59 | +1.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.98 | 11.54 | +3.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHE | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 1.95 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.78 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.83 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.77 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
SHE vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHE drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHE and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHE | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.80% | -33.78% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.54% | -6.85% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.07% | -13.94% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.69% | -22.30% | -9.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.80% | -33.78% | -2.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.50% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -3.70% | -2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 1.53% | +0.57% |
Volatility
SHE vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.78%. This indicates that SHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHE | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 1.78% | +3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | 6.66% | +3.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.94% | 9.09% | +3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 14.33% | +2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 16.42% | +1.62% |
SHE vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SHE vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
SHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than QUS's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
SHE SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF | 1.06% | 1.18% | 1.14% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 0.99% | 1.24% | 1.91% | 7.39% | 5.37% | 6.41% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHE and QUS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHE has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHE dropped -35.80% vs QUS's -33.78%.
On 10-year performance, QUS leads with 13.67% vs 12.83% for SHE. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QUS has performed better with a 13.67% return vs 12.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SHE.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 1.06% for SHE.
SHE tracks SSGA Gender Diversity (TR), while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SHE and 0.15% for QUS.
SHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHE and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer