SHAZ vs. WRDLY

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

SHAZ (SharonAI Holdings Inc) and WRDLY (Worldline SA) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — SHAZ in Information Technology Services, WRDLY in Software - Infrastructure. Over the past 3 years, SHAZ returned 81.02%/yr vs 190.78%/yr for WRDLY. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

SHAZ vs. WRDLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SharonAI Holdings Inc (SHAZ) and Worldline SA (WRDLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHAZ achieves a 3,269.73% return, which is significantly lower than WRDLY's 51,735.42% return.

SHAZ

• 1D: -2.04%
• 1M: -32.75%
• 6M: 3,269.73%
• YTD: 3,269.73%
• 1Y: 41,460.00%
• 3Y*: 81.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 50.13%

WRDLY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2,030.84%
• 6M: 54,617.86%
• YTD: 51,735.42%
• 1Y: 22,924.63%
• 3Y*: 190.78%
• 5Y*: 57.10%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 50.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHAZ vs. WRDLY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SHAZ SharonAI Holdings Inc	3,269.73%	6,066.67%	-99.73%	6.31%	3.88%	1.48%
WRDLY Worldline SA	51,735.42%	-78.78%	-50.84%	-55.64%	-30.39%	1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SHAZ and WRDLY is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2021	-0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap SHAZ : $610.40M WRDLY : $80.59M
EPS SHAZ : -$3.47 WRDLY : -€9.73
PS Ratio SHAZ : 680.38 WRDLY : 0.32
PB Ratio SHAZ : 9.80 WRDLY : 0.86
Total Revenue (TTM) SHAZ : $1.54M WRDLY : €8.65B
Gross Profit (TTM) SHAZ : -$1.46M WRDLY : €4.77B
EBITDA (TTM) SHAZ : -$40.42M WRDLY : €1.07B

Return for Risk

SHAZ vs. WRDLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHAZ

SHAZ Risk / Return Rank: 100
SHAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
SHAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
SHAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 100
SHAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
SHAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 100

WRDLY

WRDLY Risk / Return Rank: 100
WRDLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
WRDLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
WRDLY Omega Ratio Rank: 100
WRDLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
WRDLY Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHAZ vs. WRDLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SharonAI Holdings Inc (SHAZ) and Worldline SA (WRDLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHAZ	WRDLY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	39.12	4.35	+34.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	35.41	70.71	-35.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	7.35	11.98	-4.63
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1,516.91	269.27	+1,247.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3,611.14	476.73	+3,134.41

SHAZ vs. WRDLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHAZ Sharpe Ratio is 39.12, which is higher than the WRDLY Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHAZ and WRDLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SHAZ vs. WRDLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHAZ drawdown since its inception was -99.78%, roughly equal to the maximum WRDLY drawdown of -99.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHAZ and WRDLY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHAZ	WRDLY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.78%	-99.40%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.73%	-87.01%	+42.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-99.78%	-98.48%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-99.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.75%	-9.81%	-22.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.38%	-59.83%	+24.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.07%	49.05%	-30.98%

Volatility

SHAZ vs. WRDLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SharonAI Holdings Inc (SHAZ) is 33.63%, while Worldline SA (WRDLY) has a volatility of 317.12%. This indicates that SHAZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRDLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHAZ	WRDLY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.63%	317.12%	-283.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	291.53%	525.07%	-233.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1,738.17%	5,402.75%	-3,664.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1,797.24%	2,420.83%	-623.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1,797.24%	2,174.19%	-376.95%

Dividends

SHAZ vs. WRDLY - Dividend Comparison

SHAZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WRDLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%.

Position	TTM
SHAZ SharonAI Holdings Inc	0.00%
WRDLY Worldline SA	7.11%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHAZ and WRDLY in my portfolio?

SHAZ and WRDLY have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHAZ or WRDLY?

WRDLY has higher volatility (317.12%) compared to SHAZ (33.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHAZ dropped -99.78% vs WRDLY's -99.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHAZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (39.12 vs 4.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.