WRDLY vs. AMBZ
WRDLY (Worldline SA) and AMBZ (American Business Bank) are both stocks. WRDLY operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while AMBZ operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, WRDLY returned 57.42%/yr vs 15.22%/yr for AMBZ. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WRDLY vs. AMBZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WRDLY achieves a 51,735.42% return, which is significantly higher than AMBZ's 14.30% return.
WRDLY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2,030.84%
- 6M
- 54,617.86%
- YTD
- 51,735.42%
- 1Y
- 22,981.48%
- 3Y*
- 191.29%
- 5Y*
- 57.42%
- 10Y*
- —
AMBZ
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 16.11%
- YTD
- 14.30%
- 1Y
- 59.19%
- 3Y*
- 38.94%
- 5Y*
- 15.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.43%
WRDLY vs. AMBZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRDLY Worldline SA | 51,735.42% | -78.78% | -50.84% | -55.64% | -30.39% | -42.19% | 49.03% | 16.07% |
AMBZ American Business Bank | 14.30% | 50.38% | 22.29% | -9.60% | 0.79% | 24.07% | -10.72% | 2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between WRDLY and AMBZ is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2019 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
WRDLY:
$80.59M
AMBZ:
$653.72M
WRDLY:
-€9.73
AMBZ:
$6.33
WRDLY:
0.32
AMBZ:
3.30
WRDLY:
0.86
AMBZ:
1.60
WRDLY:
€8.65B
AMBZ:
$204.45M
WRDLY:
€4.77B
AMBZ:
$119.91M
WRDLY:
€1.07B
AMBZ:
$80.01M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WRDLY vs. AMBZ — Risk / Return Rank
WRDLY
AMBZ
WRDLY vs. AMBZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Worldline SA (WRDLY) and American Business Bank (AMBZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WRDLY | AMBZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +55.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 11.98 | 3.46 | +8.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 269.94 | 29.42 | +240.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 477.95 | 89.29 | +388.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WRDLY vs. AMBZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRDLY drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than AMBZ's maximum drawdown of -51.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRDLY and AMBZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRDLY | AMBZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -51.52% | -47.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -87.01% | -2.02% | -84.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.48% | -22.56% | -75.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.40% | -40.69% | -58.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.81% | 0.00% | -9.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.86% | -12.44% | -47.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.04% | 0.67% | +48.37% |
Volatility
WRDLY vs. AMBZ - Volatility Comparison
Worldline SA (WRDLY) has a higher volatility of 317.12% compared to American Business Bank (AMBZ) at 1.14%. This indicates that WRDLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMBZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WRDLY | AMBZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 317.12% | 1.14% | +315.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 525.08% | 7.56% | +517.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5,392.05% | 10.65% | +5,381.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2,419.87% | 18.43% | +2,401.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2,174.89% | 19.76% | +2,155.13% |
Dividends
WRDLY vs. AMBZ - Dividend Comparison
WRDLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%, more than AMBZ's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMBZ American Business Bank | 1.50% | 1.54% |
WRDLY Worldline SA | 7.11% | 0.00% |
Financials
WRDLY vs. AMBZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Worldline SA and American Business Bank. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WRDLY vs. AMBZ - Profitability Comparison
WRDLY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Worldline SA reported a gross profit of 763.01M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.1%.
AMBZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, American Business Bank reported a gross profit of 41.93M and revenue of 52.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.2%.
WRDLY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Worldline SA reported an operating income of 37.82M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.
AMBZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, American Business Bank reported an operating income of 21.33M and revenue of 52.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.8%.
WRDLY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Worldline SA reported a net income of -931.75M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of -51.4%.
AMBZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, American Business Bank reported a net income of 15.86M and revenue of 52.29M, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WRDLY and AMBZ have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WRDLY has higher volatility (317.12%) compared to AMBZ (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRDLY dropped -99.40% vs AMBZ's -51.52%.
AMBZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.58 vs 4.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WRDLY and AMBZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer