SH vs. TSLS
SH (ProShares Short S&P500) and TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds - SH tracks the S&P 500 Index (-100% daily) while TSLS tracks the Tesla, Inc. (-100% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SH returned -12.05%/yr vs -29.03%/yr for TSLS. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SH charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSLS.
Performance
SH vs. TSLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SH achieves a -7.97% return, which is significantly lower than TSLS's 28.69% return.
SH
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- 6M
- -6.60%
- YTD
- -7.97%
- 1Y
- -14.42%
- 3Y*
- -12.05%
- 5Y*
- -8.25%
- 10Y*
- -12.49%
- ALL TIME*
- -11.35%
TSLS
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- 18.41%
- 6M
- 21.28%
- YTD
- 28.69%
- 1Y
- -17.90%
- 3Y*
- -29.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $269.15M | $242.02M | $299.42M | |
| $28.31M | $26.86M | $30.95M |
SH vs. TSLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -7.97% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 7.67% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF | 28.69% | -34.95% | -55.71% | -60.12% | 105.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SH and TSLS is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022 | 0.57 |
The correlation between SH and TSLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SH vs. TSLS — Risk / Return Rank
SH
TSLS
SH vs. TSLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SH | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.97 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | -0.45 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.66 | -0.64 | -1.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SH vs. TSLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SH drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLS drawdown of -90.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SH and TSLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SH | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.66% | -90.73% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.06% | -40.10% | +24.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.82% | -84.16% | +45.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.62% | -87.03% | -7.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.93% | -64.46% | -3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.08% | 29.55% | -20.47% |
Volatility
SH vs. TSLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) is 3.78%, while Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS) has a volatility of 18.53%. This indicates that SH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SH | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 18.53% | -14.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.16% | 33.99% | -23.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 46.87% | -34.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 58.97% | -41.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 58.97% | -40.94% |
SH vs. TSLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SH has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLS's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SH vs. TSLS - Dividend Comparison
SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than TSLS's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.25% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF | 2.44% | 4.30% | 7.62% | 4.52% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SH and TSLS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLS has higher volatility (18.53%) compared to SH (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SH dropped -94.66% vs TSLS's -90.73%.
On 3-year performance, SH leads with -12.05% vs -29.03% for TSLS. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SH has performed better with a -12.05% return vs -29.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SH is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TSLS.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.25%, compared with 2.44% for TSLS.
SH tracks S&P 500 Index (-100% daily), while TSLS tracks Tesla, Inc. (-100% Daily). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SH and 0.95% for TSLS.
TSLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.38 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SH and TSLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer