SH vs. EDZ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SH (ProShares Short S&P500) and EDZ (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - SH is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-100% daily), while EDZ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SH returned -12.49%/yr vs -33.91%/yr for EDZ. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SH charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for EDZ.

Performance

SH vs. EDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SH achieves a -7.97% return, which is significantly higher than EDZ's -51.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SH has outperformed EDZ with an annualized return of -12.49%, while EDZ has yielded a comparatively lower -33.91% annualized return.

SH

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -1.30%
• 6M: -6.60%
• YTD: -7.97%
• 1Y: -14.42%
• 3Y*: -12.05%
• 5Y*: -8.25%
• 10Y*: -12.49%
• ALL TIME*: -11.35%

EDZ

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 3.45%
• 6M: -38.42%
• YTD: -51.70%
• 1Y: -67.92%
• 3Y*: -44.52%
• 5Y*: -25.63%
• 10Y*: -33.91%
• ALL TIME*: -40.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares	$4.63M	$3.67M	$4.34M
SH ProShares Short S&P500	$269.15M	$242.02M	$299.42M

SH vs. EDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SH ProShares Short S&P500	-7.97%	-11.35%	-13.52%	-14.80%	18.98%	-24.21%	-25.09%	-22.12%	4.93%	-17.36%
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares	-51.70%	-59.30%	-12.71%	-20.28%	49.27%	-8.69%	-68.79%	-43.01%	32.87%	-64.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SH and EDZ is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2008	0.73

The correlation between SH and EDZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (5 years) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SH vs. EDZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SH	EDZ
Financial Services	81.2%	26.2%
Basic Materials	-	3.7%
Communication Services	-	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.0%
Energy	-	3.9%
Healthcare	-	5.9%
Industrials	-	19.7%
Real Estate	-	1.4%
Technology	-	14.6%
Utilities	-	7.2%

Return for Risk

SH vs. EDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SH

SH Risk / Return Rank: 1
SH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
SH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
SH Omega Ratio Rank: 2
SH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SH Martin Ratio Rank: 0

EDZ

EDZ Risk / Return Rank: 1
EDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
EDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
EDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
EDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SH vs. EDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SH	EDZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.13	-0.93	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.61	-1.68	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	0.81	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	-0.92	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.66	-1.47	-0.19

SH vs. EDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SH Sharpe Ratio is -1.13, which is comparable to the EDZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SH and EDZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SH vs. EDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SH drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, smaller than the maximum EDZ drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SH and EDZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SH	EDZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.66%	-99.99%	+5.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.06%	-74.04%	+57.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.82%	-90.46%	+51.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.53%	-92.91%	+48.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.80%	-98.90%	+24.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.62%	-99.99%	+5.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.93%	-97.74%	+29.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.08%	47.78%	-38.70%

Volatility

SH vs. EDZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) is 3.78%, while Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) has a volatility of 27.36%. This indicates that SH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SH	EDZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	27.36%	-23.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.16%	66.08%	-55.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.78%	73.06%	-60.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.98%	59.77%	-42.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.03%	61.92%	-43.89%

SH vs. EDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SH has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than EDZ's 1.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

SH vs. EDZ - Dividend Comparison

SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than EDZ's 6.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares	6.93%	6.58%	4.87%	4.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.82%	1.67%	0.68%	0.00%
SH ProShares Short S&P500	4.25%	4.49%	6.20%	5.37%	1.08%	0.00%	0.16%	1.76%	1.01%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SH and EDZ in my portfolio?

SH and EDZ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SH or EDZ?

EDZ has higher volatility (27.36%) compared to SH (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SH dropped -94.66% vs EDZ's -99.99%.

Which ETF is better, SH or EDZ?

On 10-year performance, SH leads with -12.49% vs -33.91% for EDZ. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SH or EDZ?

Over the 10-year period, SH has performed better with a -12.49% return vs -33.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SH or EDZ?

SH is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for EDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SH or EDZ?

EDZ has the higher dividend yield at 6.93%, compared with 4.25% for SH.

What is the main difference between SH and EDZ?

SH is categorized as Inverse Equities, while EDZ is Leveraged Equities. SH tracks S&P 500 Index (-100% daily), while EDZ tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SH and 1.08% for EDZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.93 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.