PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGVT vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGVT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGVT achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.99% return.


SGVT

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.68%
1Y
3.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
1.74%
1M
2.12%
YTD
10.99%
6M
11.51%
1Y
27.95%
3Y*
21.25%
5Y*
13.93%
10Y*
15.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGVT vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SGVT
Schwab Government Money Market ETF
1.51%2.22%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.99%14.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SGVT and VOO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGVT vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGVT
SGVT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGVT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGVT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGVT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGVTVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+16.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+97.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

36.10

1.42

+34.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

138.97

3.15

+135.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1,477.41

14.25

+1,463.16

SGVT vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGVT Sharpe Ratio is 18.33, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGVT and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGVT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGVT drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGVT and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGVTVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-33.99%

+33.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

-8.90%

+8.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.63%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-3.68%

+3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

1.97%

-1.97%

Volatility

SGVT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) is 0.07%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that SGVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGVTVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

4.61%

-4.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

9.72%

-9.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21%

12.34%

-12.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.21%

16.90%

-16.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.21%

18.05%

-17.84%

SGVT vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGVT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGVT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGVT
Schwab Government Money Market ETF
3.12%1.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGVT and VOO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to SGVT (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGVT dropped -0.03% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 1-year performance, VOO leads with 27.95% vs 3.74% for SGVT. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SGVT has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VOO has performed better with a 27.95% return vs 3.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for SGVT.

SGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

SGVT is categorized as Money Market, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SGVT and 0.03% for VOO.

SGVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGVT and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer