SGVT vs. SCHA
SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGVT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while SCHA is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index. SGVT is actively managed, while SCHA is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. SGVT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
SGVT vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGVT achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 19.79% return.
SGVT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHA
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
SGVT vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 1.41% | 2.22% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 19.79% | 15.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGVT and SCHA is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGVT vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
SGVT
SCHA
SGVT vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGVT | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 18.57 | 0.57 | +18.00 |
Drawdowns
SGVT vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGVT drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGVT and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGVT | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -42.41% | +42.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.58% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -7.58% | +7.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.58% | — |
Volatility
SGVT vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGVT | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20% | 18.01% | -17.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.20% | 21.93% | -21.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.20% | 22.71% | -22.51% |
SGVT vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGVT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGVT vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than SCHA's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 3.12% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGVT and SCHA have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for SGVT.
SGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 1.00% for SCHA.
SGVT is categorized as Money Market, while SCHA is Small Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SGVT and 0.04% for SCHA.
Find the right allocation for SGVT and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer