SGVT vs. ISRA
SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) and ISRA (VanEck Israel ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGVT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while ISRA is a Global Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Israel Global Index. SGVT is actively managed, while ISRA is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. SGVT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for ISRA.
Performance
SGVT vs. ISRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGVT achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than ISRA's 14.50% return.
SGVT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISRA
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- 14.50%
- 6M
- 16.99%
- 1Y
- 41.47%
- 3Y*
- 26.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.78%
SGVT vs. ISRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 1.41% | 2.22% |
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 14.50% | 26.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGVT and ISRA is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGVT vs. ISRA — Risk / Return Rank
SGVT
ISRA
SGVT vs. ISRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGVT | ISRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 18.52 | 0.47 | +18.05 |
Drawdowns
SGVT vs. ISRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGVT drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum ISRA drawdown of -45.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGVT and ISRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGVT | ISRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -45.02% | +44.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.35% | +4.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -11.18% | +11.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.91% | — |
Volatility
SGVT vs. ISRA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGVT | ISRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20% | 20.84% | -20.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.20% | 21.86% | -21.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.20% | 20.91% | -20.71% |
SGVT vs. ISRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGVT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than ISRA's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGVT vs. ISRA - Dividend Comparison
SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than ISRA's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 1.29% | 1.48% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 1.28% | 0.17% | 1.38% | 0.76% | 1.58% | 1.62% | 1.31% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 3.12% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGVT and ISRA have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGVT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGVT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ISRA.
SGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 1.29% for ISRA.
SGVT is categorized as Money Market, while ISRA is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SGVT and 0.59% for ISRA.
Find the right allocation for SGVT and ISRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer