SGVT vs. FNDX
SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGVT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. SGVT is actively managed, while FNDX is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. SGVT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
SGVT vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGVT achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return.
SGVT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
SGVT vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 1.41% | 2.22% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 14.57% | 13.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGVT and FNDX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGVT vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
SGVT
FNDX
SGVT vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGVT | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 18.57 | 0.79 | +17.78 |
Drawdowns
SGVT vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGVT drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGVT and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGVT | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -37.72% | +37.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -3.55% | +3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.55% | — |
Volatility
SGVT vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGVT | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20% | 10.22% | -10.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.20% | 15.18% | -14.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.20% | 17.50% | -17.30% |
SGVT vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGVT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGVT vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than FNDX's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 3.12% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGVT and FNDX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for SGVT.
SGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 1.45% for FNDX.
SGVT is categorized as Money Market, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SGVT and 0.25% for FNDX.
Find the right allocation for SGVT and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer