PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGVT vs. FAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGVT vs. FAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGVT achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than FAI's 25.97% return.


SGVT

1D
0.02%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.67%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FAI

1D
-1.26%
1M
0.70%
YTD
25.97%
6M
24.79%
1Y
50.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGVT vs. FAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SGVT and FAI is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGVT vs. FAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGVT
SGVT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGVT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGVT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

FAI
FAI Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAI Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAI Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGVT vs. FAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGVTFAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+15.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+80.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

29.17

1.32

+27.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

137.94

2.71

+135.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1,101.11

8.35

+1,092.76

SGVT vs. FAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGVT Sharpe Ratio is 17.28, which is higher than the FAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGVT and FAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGVT vs. FAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGVT drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum FAI drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGVT and FAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGVTFAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-27.82%

+27.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

-18.84%

+18.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-10.52%

+10.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-5.39%

+5.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

6.10%

-6.10%

Volatility

SGVT vs. FAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) is 0.09%, while First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) has a volatility of 14.72%. This indicates that SGVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGVTFAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

14.72%

-14.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.15%

22.68%

-22.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22%

27.46%

-27.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.22%

31.10%

-30.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.22%

31.10%

-30.88%

SGVT vs. FAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGVT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FAI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGVT vs. FAI - Dividend Comparison

SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, while FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
FAI
First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.00%0.00%0.04%
SGVT
Schwab Government Money Market ETF
3.11%1.73%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGVT and FAI have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAI has higher volatility (14.72%) compared to SGVT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGVT dropped -0.03% vs FAI's -27.82%.

On 1-year performance, FAI leads with 50.75% vs 3.72% for SGVT. On fees, SGVT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, SGVT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FAI has performed better with a 50.75% return vs 3.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGVT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FAI.

SGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.

SGVT is categorized as Money Market, while FAI is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SGVT and 0.65% for FAI.

SGVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.28 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGVT and FAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer