SGVT vs. FAI
SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) and FAI (First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGVT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while FAI is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index. SGVT is actively managed, while FAI is passively managed. Over the past year, SGVT returned 3.72% vs 50.75% for FAI. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. SGVT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FAI.
Performance
SGVT vs. FAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGVT achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than FAI's 25.97% return.
SGVT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAI
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 25.97%
- 6M
- 24.79%
- 1Y
- 50.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGVT vs. FAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 1.60% | 2.22% |
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF | 25.97% | 23.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGVT and FAI is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGVT vs. FAI — Risk / Return Rank
SGVT
FAI
SGVT vs. FAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGVT | FAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +15.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +80.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 29.17 | 1.32 | +27.85 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 137.94 | 2.71 | +135.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1,101.11 | 8.35 | +1,092.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGVT vs. FAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGVT drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum FAI drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGVT and FAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGVT | FAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -27.82% | +27.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.03% | -18.84% | +18.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | -10.52% | +10.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -5.39% | +5.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 6.10% | -6.10% |
Volatility
SGVT vs. FAI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) is 0.09%, while First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) has a volatility of 14.72%. This indicates that SGVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGVT | FAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.09% | 14.72% | -14.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.15% | 22.68% | -22.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22% | 27.46% | -27.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.22% | 31.10% | -30.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.22% | 31.10% | -30.88% |
SGVT vs. FAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGVT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FAI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGVT vs. FAI - Dividend Comparison
SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, while FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 3.11% | 1.73% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGVT and FAI have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAI has higher volatility (14.72%) compared to SGVT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGVT dropped -0.03% vs FAI's -27.82%.
On 1-year performance, FAI leads with 50.75% vs 3.72% for SGVT. On fees, SGVT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, SGVT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FAI has performed better with a 50.75% return vs 3.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGVT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FAI.
SGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.
SGVT is categorized as Money Market, while FAI is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SGVT and 0.65% for FAI.
SGVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.28 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGVT and FAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer