SGVT vs. CEFS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) and CEFS (Saba Closed-End Funds ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGVT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while CEFS is a Event Driven fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. SGVT charges 0.28%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for CEFS.

Performance

SGVT vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGVT achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than CEFS's 13.75% return.

SGVT

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CEFS

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 4.35%
• YTD: 13.75%
• 6M: 15.64%
• 1Y: 25.00%
• 3Y*: 22.04%
• 5Y*: 13.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGVT vs. CEFS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF	1.41%	2.22%
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	13.75%	9.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SGVT and CEFS is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025	-0.15

Return for Risk

SGVT vs. CEFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEFS

CEFS Risk / Return Rank: 80
CEFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
CEFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CEFS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CEFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
CEFS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGVT vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGVT	CEFS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	18.57	0.79	+17.78

Drawdowns

SGVT vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGVT drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum CEFS drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGVT and CEFS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGVT	CEFS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-38.99%	+38.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.67%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.37%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.51%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-3.67%	+3.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SGVT	CEFS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.37%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.56%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20%	9.95%	-9.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.20%	13.08%	-12.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.20%	15.33%	-15.13%

SGVT vs. CEFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGVT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFS's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGVT vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison

SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than CEFS's 7.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	7.10%	7.84%	8.79%	9.20%	11.32%	10.73%	8.61%	8.10%	10.43%	5.02%
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF	3.12%	1.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGVT and CEFS in my portfolio?

SGVT and CEFS have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SGVT or CEFS?

On fees, SGVT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SGVT or CEFS?

SGVT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for CEFS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SGVT or CEFS?

CEFS has the higher dividend yield at 7.10%, compared with 3.12% for SGVT.

What is the main difference between SGVT and CEFS?

SGVT is categorized as Money Market, while CEFS is Event Driven. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SGVT and 1.29% for CEFS.