SGRT vs. MLPB

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth ETF) and MLPB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B) are both exchange-traded funds - SGRT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund, while MLPB is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. SGRT is actively managed, while MLPB is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. SGRT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MLPB.

Performance

SGRT vs. MLPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGRT achieves a 34.03% return, which is significantly higher than MLPB's 22.48% return.

SGRT

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -7.07%
• 6M: 27.60%
• YTD: 34.03%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MLPB

• 1D: 2.08%
• 1M: 3.31%
• 6M: 18.88%
• YTD: 22.48%
• 1Y: 23.15%
• 3Y*: 21.85%
• 5Y*: 20.88%
• 10Y*: 8.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGRT vs. MLPB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF	34.03%	26.83%
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B	22.48%	0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SGRT and MLPB is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	-0.10

Return for Risk

SGRT vs. MLPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGRT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MLPB

MLPB Risk / Return Rank: 58
MLPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
MLPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
MLPB Omega Ratio Rank: 57
MLPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
MLPB Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGRT vs. MLPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SGRT	MLPB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.64	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.30	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.40	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.26	—

Drawdowns

SGRT vs. MLPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGRT drawdown since its inception was -17.87%, smaller than the maximum MLPB drawdown of -71.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGRT and MLPB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGRT	MLPB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.87%	-71.93%	+54.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.68%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.49%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.41%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-71.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.78%	-2.49%	-10.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.52%	-14.74%	+11.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.71%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SGRT	MLPB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.74%	14.19%	+22.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.74%	19.87%	+16.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.74%	27.19%	+9.55%

SGRT vs. MLPB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGRT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPB's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGRT vs. MLPB - Dividend Comparison

SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than MLPB's 5.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B	5.72%	6.51%	5.95%	6.37%	6.00%	6.98%	11.93%	7.98%	8.11%	7.23%	6.85%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF	0.12%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGRT and MLPB in my portfolio?

SGRT and MLPB have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SGRT or MLPB?

On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SGRT or MLPB?

SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MLPB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SGRT or MLPB?

MLPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 0.12% for SGRT.

What is the main difference between SGRT and MLPB?

SGRT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MLPB is MLPs. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SGRT and 0.85% for MLPB.