SGRT vs. AFLG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT) and First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG).

SGRT and AFLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AFLG is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. It was launched on Dec 3, 2019.

Performance

SGRT vs. AFLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT) and First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SGRT vs. AFLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	9.56%	25.25%
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF	-0.38%	5.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGRT achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly higher than AFLG's -0.38% return.

SGRT

• 1D: 2.70%
• 1M: -6.90%
• YTD: 9.56%
• 6M: 15.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AFLG

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -3.71%
• YTD: -0.38%
• 6M: 0.50%
• 1Y: 16.01%
• 3Y*: 18.54%
• 5Y*: 11.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGRT vs. AFLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGRT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than AFLG's 0.55% expense ratio.

SGRT

SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF

AFLG

First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF

Return for Risk

SGRT vs. AFLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFLG

AFLG Risk / Return Rank: 52
AFLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
AFLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
AFLG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
AFLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
AFLG Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGRT vs. AFLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT) and First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGRT	AFLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.09	0.64	+1.44

Correlation

The correlation between SGRT and AFLG is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SGRT vs. AFLG - Dividend Comparison

SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than AFLG's 0.79% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.15%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF	0.79%	0.84%	0.53%	1.53%	1.52%	0.93%	1.28%	0.20%

Drawdowns

SGRT vs. AFLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGRT drawdown since its inception was -17.87%, smaller than the maximum AFLG drawdown of -35.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGRT and AFLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGRT	AFLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.87%	-35.84%	+17.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.21%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.09%	-4.79%	-2.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.52%	-5.85%	+2.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SGRT	AFLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.14%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.18%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.60%	17.34%	+15.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.60%	15.85%	+16.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.60%	19.36%	+13.24%