PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGPYY vs. UL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SGPYY vs. UL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sage Group PLC ADR (SGPYY) and Unilever PLC (UL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGPYY achieves a -7.26% return, which is significantly lower than UL's -1.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SGPYY having a 5.52% annualized return and UL not far behind at 5.32%.


SGPYY

1D
0.88%
1M
17.07%
6M
1.75%
YTD
-7.26%
1Y
-16.18%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
5.52%
ALL TIME*
7.92%

UL

1D
-2.85%
1M
1.49%
6M
-5.64%
YTD
-1.37%
1Y
-3.63%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
5.32%
ALL TIME*
9.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.83M$1.93M$2.16M
$387.98M$308.85M$260.04M

SGPYY vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGPYY
Sage Group PLC ADR
-7.26%-7.16%7.97%70.61%-22.82%51.27%-17.88%33.20%-27.65%38.66%
UL
Unilever PLC
-1.37%5.96%20.90%-0.17%-2.82%-7.61%9.04%12.88%-2.34%40.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SGPYY and UL is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between SGPYY and UL has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SGPYY:

$11.84B

UL:

$136.60B

EPS

SGPYY:

£3.03

UL:

€5.38

PE Ratio

SGPYY:

12.87

UL:

10.22

PEG Ratio

SGPYY:

0.96

UL:

2.00

PS Ratio

SGPYY:

1.86

UL:

1.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

SGPYY:

£5.07B

UL:

€111.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SGPYY:

£4.66B

UL:

€111.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

SGPYY:

£1.27B

UL:

€24.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGPYY vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SGPYY
SGPYY Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SGPYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGPYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGPYY Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SGPYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGPYY Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

UL
UL Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SGPYY vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sage Group PLC ADR (SGPYY) and Unilever PLC (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGPYYULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.02

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

-0.01

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.80

-0.02

-0.78

SGPYY vs. UL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGPYY Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the UL Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGPYY and UL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGPYY vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGPYY drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than UL's maximum drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGPYY and UL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGPYYULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.33%

-53.55%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.51%

-25.09%

-8.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.41%

-25.09%

-13.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.61%

-25.09%

-13.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.85%

-30.13%

-12.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.37%

-13.52%

-8.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.79%

-10.63%

-4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.37%

13.47%

+6.90%

Volatility

SGPYY vs. UL - Volatility Comparison

Sage Group PLC ADR (SGPYY) has a higher volatility of 13.75% compared to Unilever PLC (UL) at 11.44%. This indicates that SGPYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGPYYULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.75%

11.44%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.77%

19.70%

+8.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.02%

24.32%

+7.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.04%

21.32%

+7.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.88%

21.76%

+8.12%

Dividends

SGPYY vs. UL - Dividend Comparison

SGPYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than UL's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGPYY
Sage Group PLC ADR
2.29%1.87%1.57%1.50%2.59%1.88%2.37%1.86%2.45%1.47%4.60%1.88%
UL
Unilever PLC
3.60%3.51%3.29%3.83%3.57%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.80%3.42%3.02%

Financials

SGPYY vs. UL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sage Group PLC ADR and Unilever PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SGPYY and UL have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGPYY has higher volatility (13.75%) compared to UL (11.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGPYY dropped -58.33% vs UL's -53.55%.

UL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGPYY and UL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer