SGPIX vs. VOO
SGPIX (ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - SGPIX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by ProFunds, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, SGPIX returned 9.20%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SGPIX charges 1.60%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
SGPIX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGPIX achieves a 20.78% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, SGPIX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.20%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.
SGPIX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 20.78%
- 6M
- 17.31%
- 1Y
- 30.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
VOO
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
SGPIX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGPIX ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund | 20.78% | 3.52% | 7.53% | 15.35% | -22.72% | 13.29% | 17.43% | 18.95% | -5.76% | 12.73% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.19% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGPIX and VOO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.83 |
The correlation between SGPIX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGPIX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
SGPIX
VOO
SGPIX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund (SGPIX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGPIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.35 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 2.67 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.05 | 11.96 | +0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGPIX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGPIX drawdown since its inception was -58.70%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGPIX and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGPIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.70% | -33.99% | -24.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -8.90% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.72% | -18.69% | -9.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.64% | -24.52% | -10.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.14% | -33.99% | -9.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.14% | +3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -3.68% | -7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 1.99% | +0.65% |
Volatility
SGPIX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund (SGPIX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that SGPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGPIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 4.83% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.02% | 9.82% | +3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.93% | 12.46% | +5.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.66% | 16.91% | +4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 18.02% | +4.36% |
SGPIX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGPIX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGPIX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
SGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGPIX ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.15% | 0.18% | 1.58% | 0.80% | 3.80% | 2.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.58% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGPIX and VOO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGPIX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to VOO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGPIX dropped -58.70% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGPIX and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer