SGOL vs. SLVR
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR).
SGOL and SLVR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SGOL is a passively managed fund by abrdn that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on Sep 9, 2009. SLVR is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index. It was launched on Jan 14, 2025. Both SGOL and SLVR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SGOL vs. SLVR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SGOL vs. SLVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | 8.62% | 59.66% |
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF | 6.06% | 170.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGOL achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly higher than SLVR's 6.06% return.
SGOL
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -10.99%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 21.22%
- 1Y
- 49.63%
- 3Y*
- 33.23%
- 5Y*
- 21.84%
- 10Y*
- 14.11%
SLVR
- 1D
- 8.91%
- 1M
- -29.01%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 38.57%
- 1Y
- 156.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SGOL vs. SLVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGOL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVR's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SGOL vs. SLVR — Risk / Return Rank
SGOL
SLVR
SGOL vs. SLVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGOL | SLVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 2.57 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | 2.67 | -0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.37 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 4.00 | -1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.02 | 13.77 | -3.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGOL | SLVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 2.57 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 2.42 | -1.84 |
Correlation
The correlation between SGOL and SLVR is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SGOL vs. SLVR - Dividend Comparison
SGOL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF | 3.47% | 3.68% |
Drawdowns
SGOL vs. SLVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGOL drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, which is greater than SLVR's maximum drawdown of -38.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOL and SLVR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGOL | SLVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.51% | -38.60% | -6.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.14% | -38.60% | +19.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.21% | -29.01% | +15.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.46% | -6.83% | -11.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.17% | 11.21% | -6.04% |
Volatility
SGOL vs. SLVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) is 10.97%, while Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) has a volatility of 23.19%. This indicates that SGOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SGOL | SLVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.97% | 23.19% | -12.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.00% | 53.62% | -29.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.51% | 61.25% | -33.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 58.32% | -40.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 58.32% | -42.48% |