SGOL vs. MCD
SGOL (abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while MCD (McDonald's Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SGOL returned 11.62%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for MCD. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SGOL vs. MCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGOL achieves a -6.06% return, which is significantly higher than MCD's -12.30% return. Over the past 10 years, SGOL has outperformed MCD with an annualized return of 11.62%, while MCD has yielded a comparatively lower 10.72% annualized return.
SGOL
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- -18.71%
- YTD
- -6.06%
- 1Y
- 21.20%
- 3Y*
- 27.11%
- 5Y*
- 17.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.34%
MCD
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- -13.32%
- YTD
- -12.30%
- 1Y
- -9.14%
- 3Y*
- -0.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.15B | $1.27B | $1.25B | |
| $79.87M | $79.24M | $102.39M |
SGOL vs. MCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | -6.06% | 63.99% | 26.90% | 12.99% | -0.51% | -3.94% | 25.03% | 18.21% | -1.94% | 12.86% |
MCD McDonald's Corporation | -12.30% | 7.89% | 0.14% | 15.06% | 0.51% | 27.79% | 11.30% | 13.97% | 5.78% | 45.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGOL and MCD is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2009 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGOL vs. MCD — Risk / Return Rank
SGOL
MCD
SGOL vs. MCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and McDonald's Corporation (MCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGOL | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.94 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | -0.36 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.73 | -0.81 | +2.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGOL vs. MCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGOL drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, smaller than the maximum MCD drawdown of -73.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOL and MCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGOL | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.51% | -73.20% | +27.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.32% | -21.99% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.32% | -21.99% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.32% | -21.99% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.32% | -36.90% | +10.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.94% | -21.41% | -3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.45% | -14.90% | -3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.64% | 9.81% | +1.83% |
Volatility
SGOL vs. MCD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) is 6.07%, while McDonald's Corporation (MCD) has a volatility of 7.94%. This indicates that SGOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGOL | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 7.94% | -1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.69% | 14.13% | +9.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.79% | 18.01% | +9.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 17.57% | +0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 20.53% | -4.45% |
Dividends
SGOL vs. MCD - Dividend Comparison
SGOL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCD McDonald's Corporation | 2.78% | 2.35% | 2.34% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.96% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.97% | 2.91% |
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGOL and MCD have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCD has higher volatility (7.94%) compared to SGOL (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOL dropped -45.51% vs MCD's -73.20%.
SGOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGOL and MCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer