SGOL vs. KGLD
SGOL (abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF) and KGLD (Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF ) are both exchange-traded funds - SGOL is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while KGLD is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv. SGOL is passively managed, while KGLD is actively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SGOL charges 0.17%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for KGLD.
Performance
SGOL vs. KGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGOL achieves a -6.67% return, which is significantly higher than KGLD's -7.21% return.
SGOL
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -10.69%
- YTD
- -6.67%
- 6M
- -10.17%
- 1Y
- 20.57%
- 3Y*
- 27.73%
- 5Y*
- 17.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
KGLD
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -11.26%
- YTD
- -7.21%
- 6M
- -11.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGOL vs. KGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | -6.67% | 29.06% |
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | -7.21% | 29.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGOL and KGLD is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGOL vs. KGLD — Risk / Return Rank
SGOL
KGLD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SGOL vs. KGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGOL | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGOL vs. KGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGOL drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, which is greater than KGLD's maximum drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOL and KGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGOL | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.51% | -28.07% | -17.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.42% | -27.38% | +1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.42% | -7.15% | -11.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.34% | — | — |
Volatility
SGOL vs. KGLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGOL | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.43% | 29.09% | -1.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 29.09% | -10.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 29.09% | -13.06% |
SGOL vs. KGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGOL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than KGLD's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGOL vs. KGLD - Dividend Comparison
SGOL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 14.03% | 4.59% |
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SGOL and KGLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SGOL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGOL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KGLD.
KGLD has the higher dividend yield at 14.03%, compared with 0.00% for SGOL.
SGOL is categorized as Gold, while KGLD is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for SGOL and 1.00% for KGLD.
Find the right allocation for SGOL and KGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer