PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGOL vs. IAUI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGOL vs. IAUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGOL achieves a -6.67% return, which is significantly higher than IAUI's -7.74% return.


SGOL

1D
1.00%
1M
-10.69%
YTD
-6.67%
6M
-10.17%
1Y
20.57%
3Y*
27.73%
5Y*
17.55%
10Y*
11.49%

IAUI

1D
0.96%
1M
-10.18%
YTD
-7.74%
6M
-9.97%
1Y
11.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGOL vs. IAUI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SGOL
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF
-6.67%27.66%
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
-7.74%20.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SGOL and IAUI is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

0.97

The correlation between SGOL and IAUI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGOL vs. IAUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGOL
SGOL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
SGOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOL Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOL Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

IAUI
IAUI Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IAUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUI Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUI Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGOL vs. IAUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGOLIAUIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.12

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

0.50

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.21

1.56

+0.64

SGOL vs. IAUI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGOL Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the IAUI Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGOL and IAUI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGOL vs. IAUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGOL drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, which is greater than IAUI's maximum drawdown of -22.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOL and IAUI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGOLIAUIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.51%

-22.50%

-23.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.16%

-22.50%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.42%

-21.76%

-3.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.42%

-4.26%

-14.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.34%

7.14%

+2.20%

Volatility

SGOL vs. IAUI - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) have volatilities of 8.65% and 8.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGOLIAUIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.65%

8.37%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.24%

20.02%

+4.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.43%

21.63%

+5.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

21.23%

-3.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.03%

21.23%

-5.20%

SGOL vs. IAUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGOL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than IAUI's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGOL vs. IAUI - Dividend Comparison

SGOL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IAUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.06%.


PositionTTM2025
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
14.06%6.88%
SGOL
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SGOL and IAUI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SGOL has higher volatility (8.65%) compared to IAUI (8.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOL dropped -45.51% vs IAUI's -22.50%.

On 1-year performance, SGOL leads with 20.57% vs 11.14% for IAUI. On fees, SGOL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, IAUI has been the lower-risk option at 8.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SGOL has performed better with a 20.57% return vs 11.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.

IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 14.06%, compared with 0.00% for SGOL.

SGOL is categorized as Gold, while IAUI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for SGOL and 0.78% for IAUI.

SGOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGOL and IAUI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer