SGOL vs. FLRT
SGOL (abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF) and FLRT (Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGOL is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while FLRT is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Pacific Life. SGOL is passively managed, while FLRT is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGOL returned 13.32%/yr vs 5.00%/yr for FLRT. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGOL charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for FLRT.
Performance
SGOL vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGOL achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly higher than FLRT's 1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, SGOL has outperformed FLRT with an annualized return of 13.32%, while FLRT has yielded a comparatively lower 5.00% annualized return.
SGOL
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 2.97%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 32.27%
- 3Y*
- 31.36%
- 5Y*
- 18.40%
- 10Y*
- 13.32%
FLRT
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 2.55%
- 1Y
- 6.08%
- 3Y*
- 8.90%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- 5.00%
SGOL vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | 2.97% | 63.99% | 26.90% | 12.99% | -0.51% | -3.94% | 25.03% | 18.21% | -1.94% | 12.86% |
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | 1.83% | 6.24% | 9.18% | 14.59% | -2.72% | 3.18% | 2.78% | 9.44% | -1.14% | 1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGOL and FLRT is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2015 | 0.05 |
The correlation between SGOL and FLRT shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGOL vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank
SGOL
FLRT
SGOL vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGOL | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.95 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 3.43 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.20 | 12.62 | -8.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGOL | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 3.89 | -2.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 2.61 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.81 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.75 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
SGOL vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGOL drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, which is greater than FLRT's maximum drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOL and FLRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGOL | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.51% | -20.96% | -24.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.14% | -1.78% | -17.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.14% | -2.87% | -16.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -7.60% | -13.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.56% | -20.96% | -0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.72% | -0.15% | -17.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.41% | -1.41% | -17.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.71% | 0.48% | +7.23% |
Volatility
SGOL vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.40%. This indicates that SGOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGOL | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 0.40% | +5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.93% | 1.19% | +21.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.33% | 1.57% | +24.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 2.30% | +15.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 6.17% | +9.74% |
SGOL vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGOL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGOL vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison
SGOL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | 6.81% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGOL and FLRT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGOL has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to FLRT (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOL dropped -45.51% vs FLRT's -20.96%.
On 10-year performance, SGOL leads with 13.32% vs 5.00% for FLRT. On fees, SGOL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, FLRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SGOL has performed better with a 13.32% return vs 5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGOL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for FLRT.
FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.81%, compared with 0.00% for SGOL.
SGOL is categorized as Precious Metals, while FLRT is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Pacific Life. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for SGOL and 0.69% for FLRT.
FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.89 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGOL and FLRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer