PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGLP.L vs. XBLC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGLP.L vs. XBLC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SGLP.L is traded in GBp, while XBLC.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XBLC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGLP.L achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than XBLC.L's 0.13% return.


SGLP.L

1D
3.07%
1M
-4.98%
YTD
1.23%
6M
0.99%
1Y
28.56%
3Y*
28.32%
5Y*
19.60%
10Y*
13.44%

XBLC.L

1D
0.42%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.13%
6M
-0.45%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
0.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGLP.L vs. XBLC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGLP.L
Invesco Physical Gold A
1.23%53.60%28.14%7.26%11.83%-2.88%19.99%14.65%4.31%-0.95%
XBLC.L
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.13%8.46%-0.38%5.36%-8.81%-6.92%8.32%0.25%-0.55%1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SGLP.L and XBLC.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2017

0.33

The correlation between SGLP.L and XBLC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGLP.L vs. XBLC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGLP.L
SGLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SGLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

XBLC.L
XBLC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XBLC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBLC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBLC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XBLC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBLC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGLP.L vs. XBLC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGLP.LXBLC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.15

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

1.08

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.83

2.67

+1.16

SGLP.L vs. XBLC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the XBLC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGLP.L and XBLC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGLP.L vs. XBLC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGLP.L drawdown since its inception was -63.75%, which is greater than XBLC.L's maximum drawdown of -21.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLP.L and XBLC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGLP.LXBLC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.75%

-21.28%

-42.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.82%

-3.75%

-19.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.82%

-3.75%

-19.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.82%

-16.74%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.18%

-5.58%

-12.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.72%

-8.81%

-22.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.44%

1.51%

+5.93%

Volatility

SGLP.L vs. XBLC.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) at 1.35%. This indicates that SGLP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBLC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGLP.LXBLC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

1.35%

+6.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.83%

3.66%

+17.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.85%

4.80%

+19.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.76%

6.24%

+15.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.77%

6.89%

+11.88%

SGLP.L vs. XBLC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SGLP.L and XBLC.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SGLP.L vs. XBLC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGLP.L nor XBLC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SGLP.L and XBLC.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGLP.L and XBLC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

SGLP.L is categorized as Gold, while XBLC.L is European Corporate Bonds. SGLP.L tracks Gold, while XBLC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGLP.L and XBLC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer