SGLP.L vs. BATG.DE
SGLP.L (Invesco Physical Gold A) and BATG.DE (L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGLP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while BATG.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Japan. Both are passively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGLP.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for BATG.DE.
Performance
SGLP.L vs. BATG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGLP.L is traded in GBp, while BATG.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the BATG.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
SGLP.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -3.54%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 5.23%
- 1Y
- 34.67%
- 3Y*
- 28.15%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
BATG.DE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGLP.L vs. BATG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A | 3.97% | 53.60% | 28.14% | 7.26% | 5.24% |
BATG.DE L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF | 0.00% | 6.91% | 7.88% | 10.51% | 3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGLP.L and BATG.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGLP.L vs. BATG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SGLP.L
BATG.DE
SGLP.L vs. BATG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) and L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGLP.L | BATG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGLP.L | BATG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SGLP.L vs. BATG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGLP.L | BATG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.97% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.37% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.65% | — | — |
Volatility
SGLP.L vs. BATG.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGLP.L | BATG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.02% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | — | — |
SGLP.L vs. BATG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGLP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BATG.DE's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SGLP.L vs. BATG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGLP.L nor BATG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGLP.L and BATG.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for BATG.DE.
SGLP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while BATG.DE is Japan Equities. SGLP.L tracks Gold, while BATG.DE tracks Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Japan. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SGLP.L and 0.16% for BATG.DE.
Find the right allocation for SGLP.L and BATG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer