PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGLN.L vs. SSLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGLN.L vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGLN.L achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly higher than SSLN.L's -5.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SGLN.L has underperformed SSLN.L with an annualized return of 13.01%, while SSLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.83% annualized return.


SGLN.L

1D
2.90%
1M
-9.40%
YTD
-1.83%
6M
-1.90%
1Y
25.94%
3Y*
26.65%
5Y*
18.64%
10Y*
13.01%

SSLN.L

1D
5.29%
1M
-22.94%
YTD
-5.21%
6M
9.19%
1Y
88.53%
3Y*
38.49%
5Y*
20.27%
10Y*
14.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGLN.L vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
-1.83%53.66%28.20%7.24%11.84%-2.82%19.93%14.63%4.36%1.68%
SSLN.L
iShares Physical Silver ETC
-5.21%130.26%23.21%-6.20%15.75%-11.83%41.04%12.68%-3.48%-5.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SGLN.L and SSLN.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011

0.74

The correlation between SGLN.L and SSLN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGLN.L vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGLN.L
SGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SSLN.L
SSLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGLN.L vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGLN.LSSLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.30

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

2.09

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.51

4.71

-1.20

SGLN.L vs. SSLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGLN.L and SSLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGLN.L vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -53.23%, smaller than the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -78.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLN.L and SSLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGLN.LSSLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.23%

-78.44%

+25.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.87%

-42.08%

+19.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-42.08%

+19.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-42.08%

+19.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.87%

-42.08%

+19.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.64%

-39.02%

+18.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.70%

-59.69%

+34.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.37%

18.73%

-11.36%

Volatility

SGLN.L vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) is 6.68%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a volatility of 14.40%. This indicates that SGLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGLN.LSSLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

14.40%

-7.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.78%

52.43%

-31.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.82%

55.28%

-31.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.84%

36.41%

-14.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

31.14%

-12.30%

SGLN.L vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGLN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SGLN.L vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGLN.L nor SSLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SGLN.L and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SSLN.L.

SGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while SSLN.L is Silver. SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SGLN.L and 0.20% for SSLN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGLN.L and SSLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer