SGDM vs. WOOD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD).

SGDM and WOOD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SGDM is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. It was launched on Jul 15, 2014. WOOD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both SGDM and WOOD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SGDM vs. WOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SGDM vs. WOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF	13.63%	153.46%	12.14%	2.34%	-8.23%	-9.15%	21.85%	44.27%	-15.14%	10.46%
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF	-1.47%	-3.27%	-4.21%	13.84%	-19.39%	17.03%	20.36%	19.75%	-17.73%	34.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGDM achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly higher than WOOD's -1.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SGDM has outperformed WOOD with an annualized return of 16.46%, while WOOD has yielded a comparatively lower 6.24% annualized return.

SGDM

• 1D: 4.81%
• 1M: -17.00%
• YTD: 13.63%
• 6M: 27.33%
• 1Y: 111.01%
• 3Y*: 42.57%
• 5Y*: 24.69%
• 10Y*: 16.46%

WOOD

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: -9.48%
• YTD: -1.47%
• 6M: -1.91%
• 1Y: -3.55%
• 3Y*: 1.84%
• 5Y*: -2.14%
• 10Y*: 6.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGDM vs. WOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGDM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WOOD's 0.46% expense ratio.

SGDM

Sprott Gold Miners ETF

WOOD

iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF

Return for Risk

SGDM vs. WOOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGDM

SGDM Risk / Return Rank: 92
SGDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
SGDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
SGDM Omega Ratio Rank: 90
SGDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SGDM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

WOOD

WOOD Risk / Return Rank: 8
WOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
WOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
WOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 9
WOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
WOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGDM vs. WOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SGDM	WOOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	-0.17	+2.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	-0.10	+2.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	0.99	+0.40
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.69	-0.22	+3.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.29	-0.64	+13.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SGDM vs. WOOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGDM Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the WOOD Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGDM and WOOD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGDM	WOOD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	-0.17	+2.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	-0.11	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.29	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.17	+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between SGDM and WOOD is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SGDM vs. WOOD - Dividend Comparison

SGDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than WOOD's 2.54% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF	0.92%	1.04%	1.04%	1.39%	1.42%	1.33%	0.30%	0.25%	0.50%	0.58%	0.02%	1.47%
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF	2.54%	2.51%	2.09%	1.64%	2.26%	1.24%	0.98%	1.85%	2.82%	1.19%	1.65%	2.04%

Drawdowns

SGDM vs. WOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGDM drawdown since its inception was -54.95%, smaller than the maximum WOOD drawdown of -63.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDM and WOOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGDM	WOOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.95%	-63.25%	+8.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.04%	-18.91%	-11.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.06%	-31.90%	-13.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.69%	-50.20%	+0.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.00%	-19.85%	+2.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.53%	-14.69%	-10.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.33%	6.52%	+1.81%

Volatility

SGDM vs. WOOD - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) has a higher volatility of 16.86% compared to iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) at 7.12%. This indicates that SGDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGDM	WOOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.86%	7.12%	+9.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.34%	13.33%	+25.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.74%	20.93%	+24.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.29%	19.68%	+15.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.07%	21.84%	+15.23%