SGDM vs. URNM
SGDM (Sprott Gold Miners ETF) and URNM (Sprott Uranium Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGDM is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while URNM is a Uranium fund tracking the VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGDM returned 17.63%/yr vs 13.97%/yr for URNM. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SGDM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for URNM.
Performance
SGDM vs. URNM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SGDM having a -11.23% return and URNM slightly lower at -11.51%.
SGDM
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- -5.85%
- 6M
- -18.69%
- YTD
- -11.23%
- 1Y
- 38.43%
- 3Y*
- 35.17%
- 5Y*
- 17.63%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.60%
URNM
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- 6M
- -34.68%
- YTD
- -11.51%
- 1Y
- 12.09%
- 3Y*
- 15.53%
- 5Y*
- 13.97%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 25.97%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.70M | $1.88M | $3.01M | |
| $16.15M | $21.14M | $35.55M |
SGDM vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | -11.23% | 153.46% | 12.14% | 2.34% | -8.23% | -9.15% | 21.85% | 6.40% |
URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | -11.51% | 40.78% | -14.13% | 57.80% | -11.86% | 78.32% | 68.36% | 4.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGDM and URNM is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019 | 0.40 |
The correlation between SGDM and URNM shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SGDM vs. URNM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SGDM
URNM
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
SGDM
URNM
Financial Services
SGDM
URNM
-
Communication Services
SGDM
-
URNM
-
Consumer Cyclical
SGDM
-
URNM
-
Consumer Defensive
SGDM
-
URNM
-
Energy
SGDM
-
URNM
Healthcare
SGDM
-
URNM
-
Industrials
SGDM
-
URNM
-
Real Estate
SGDM
-
URNM
-
Technology
SGDM
-
URNM
-
Utilities
SGDM
-
URNM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGDM vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank
SGDM
URNM
SGDM vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGDM | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.08 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 0.26 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.32 | 0.54 | +1.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGDM vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGDM drawdown since its inception was -54.95%, which is greater than URNM's maximum drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDM and URNM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGDM | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.95% | -50.78% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.29% | -43.89% | +5.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.29% | -50.78% | +12.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.06% | -50.78% | +5.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.16% | -42.17% | +7.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.55% | -18.48% | -7.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.71% | 20.85% | -3.14% |
Volatility
SGDM vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) is 12.24%, while Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) has a volatility of 13.67%. This indicates that SGDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGDM | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.24% | 13.67% | -1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.30% | 39.86% | -0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.67% | 53.26% | -5.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.54% | 48.65% | -12.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.98% | 46.95% | -9.97% |
SGDM vs. URNM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGDM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than URNM's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGDM vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison
SGDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than URNM's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 1.18% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.30% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.58% | 0.02% | 1.47% |
URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | 3.59% | 3.18% | 3.18% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGDM and URNM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URNM has higher volatility (13.67%) compared to SGDM (12.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDM dropped -54.95% vs URNM's -50.78%.
On 5-year performance, SGDM leads with 17.63% vs 13.97% for URNM. On fees, SGDM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SGDM has been the lower-risk option at 12.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SGDM has performed better with a 17.63% return vs 13.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGDM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNM.
URNM has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.18% for SGDM.
SGDM is categorized as Gold, while URNM is Uranium. SGDM tracks Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while URNM tracks VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGDM and 0.85% for URNM.
SGDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGDM and URNM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer