PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGDM vs. SLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGDM vs. SLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) and VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGDM achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than SLX's 32.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SGDM has underperformed SLX with an annualized return of 12.63%, while SLX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.


SGDM

1D
-2.86%
1M
0.94%
YTD
1.41%
6M
8.11%
1Y
56.96%
3Y*
38.97%
5Y*
18.63%
10Y*
12.63%

SLX

1D
-1.15%
1M
9.68%
YTD
32.29%
6M
36.55%
1Y
77.34%
3Y*
26.67%
5Y*
16.14%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGDM vs. SLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGDM
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
1.41%153.46%12.14%2.34%-8.23%-9.15%21.85%44.27%-15.14%10.46%
SLX
VanEck Vectors Steel ETF
32.29%47.45%-17.94%31.25%14.28%27.69%20.57%12.01%-19.27%24.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SGDM and SLX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2014

0.29

The correlation between SGDM and SLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (10 years) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SGDM vs. SLX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SGDM
SLX

Basic Materials

100.0%
95.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

1.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

SGDM
100.0%
SLX
95.0%

Communication Services

SGDM

-

SLX

-

Consumer Cyclical

SGDM

-

SLX

-

Consumer Defensive

SGDM

-

SLX

-

Energy

SGDM

-

SLX
3.5%

Financial Services

SGDM

-

SLX

-

Healthcare

SGDM

-

SLX

-

Industrials

SGDM

-

SLX
1.4%

Real Estate

SGDM

-

SLX

-

Technology

SGDM

-

SLX

-

Utilities

SGDM

-

SLX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGDM vs. SLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGDM
SGDM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SGDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDM Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SLX
SLX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGDM vs. SLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) and VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGDMSLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.52

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

4.76

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.83

16.63

-11.80

SGDM vs. SLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the SLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGDM and SLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGDMSLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

3.25

-1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.59

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.64

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.22

+0.04

Drawdowns

SGDM vs. SLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGDM drawdown since its inception was -54.95%, smaller than the maximum SLX drawdown of -82.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDM and SLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGDMSLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.95%

-82.14%

+27.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.04%

-16.35%

-13.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.04%

-27.39%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.06%

-33.62%

-11.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.69%

-61.64%

+11.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.93%

-1.15%

-24.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.46%

-38.73%

+13.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.83%

4.67%

+7.16%

Volatility

SGDM vs. SLX - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) has a higher volatility of 14.45% compared to VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) at 7.87%. This indicates that SGDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGDMSLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.45%

7.87%

+6.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.91%

17.92%

+18.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.84%

23.92%

+20.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.78%

27.72%

+8.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.81%

31.02%

+5.79%

SGDM vs. SLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGDM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SLX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGDM vs. SLX - Dividend Comparison

SGDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SLX's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGDM
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
1.03%1.04%1.04%1.39%1.42%1.33%0.30%0.25%0.50%0.58%0.02%1.47%
SLX
VanEck Vectors Steel ETF
1.17%1.55%3.56%2.80%4.97%7.07%1.87%3.44%6.26%2.50%1.06%5.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGDM and SLX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGDM has higher volatility (14.45%) compared to SLX (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDM dropped -54.95% vs SLX's -82.14%.

On 10-year performance, SLX leads with 19.73% vs 12.63% for SGDM. On fees, SGDM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SLX has been the lower-risk option at 7.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLX has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 12.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGDM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for SLX.

SLX has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 1.03% for SGDM.

SGDM tracks Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while SLX tracks NYSE Arca Steel Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGDM and 0.56% for SLX.

SLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGDM and SLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer