SGDM vs. FLNG
SGDM (Sprott Gold Miners ETF) is Materials fund tracking the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while FLNG (FLEX LNG Ltd) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, SGDM returned 19.03%/yr vs 28.82%/yr for FLNG. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SGDM vs. FLNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGDM achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly lower than FLNG's 25.06% return.
SGDM
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 6M
- 8.86%
- 1Y
- 59.22%
- 3Y*
- 39.67%
- 5Y*
- 19.03%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
FLNG
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -8.78%
- YTD
- 25.06%
- 6M
- 20.80%
- 1Y
- 36.92%
- 3Y*
- 10.93%
- 5Y*
- 28.82%
- 10Y*
- —
SGDM vs. FLNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 3.12% | 153.46% | 12.14% | 2.34% | -8.23% | -9.15% | 21.85% | 25.34% |
FLNG FLEX LNG Ltd | 25.06% | 22.47% | -11.61% | -1.19% | 56.32% | 202.13% | -17.14% | -1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGDM and FLNG is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019 | 0.12 |
The correlation between SGDM and FLNG shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGDM vs. FLNG — Risk / Return Rank
SGDM
FLNG
SGDM vs. FLNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) and FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGDM | FLNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 3.36 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.98 | 8.69 | -3.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGDM | FLNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.45 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.74 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.56 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
SGDM vs. FLNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGDM drawdown since its inception was -54.95%, smaller than the maximum FLNG drawdown of -71.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDM and FLNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGDM | FLNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.95% | -71.92% | +16.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.04% | -11.05% | -18.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.04% | -25.37% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.06% | -31.05% | -14.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.68% | -8.78% | -15.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.46% | -18.82% | -6.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.94% | 4.26% | +7.68% |
Volatility
SGDM vs. FLNG - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) has a higher volatility of 14.53% compared to FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) at 7.18%. This indicates that SGDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGDM | FLNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.53% | 7.18% | +7.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.91% | 18.44% | +18.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.86% | 25.58% | +19.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.78% | 39.21% | -3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.81% | 47.37% | -10.56% |
Dividends
SGDM vs. FLNG - Dividend Comparison
SGDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than FLNG's 12.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLNG FLEX LNG Ltd | 12.66% | 12.02% | 13.08% | 11.61% | 10.71% | 7.88% | 2.29% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.30% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.58% | 0.02% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGDM and FLNG have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGDM has higher volatility (14.53%) compared to FLNG (7.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDM dropped -54.95% vs FLNG's -71.92%.
FLNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGDM and FLNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer