PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGDJ vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGDJ vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGDJ achieves a -5.68% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 11.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SGDJ has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 10.80%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.93% annualized return.


SGDJ

1D
2.43%
1M
-11.96%
YTD
-5.68%
6M
-2.07%
1Y
66.21%
3Y*
47.78%
5Y*
15.18%
10Y*
10.80%

VT

1D
0.44%
1M
1.80%
YTD
11.06%
6M
11.82%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
12.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGDJ vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
-5.68%174.44%19.35%6.66%-27.60%-15.12%47.91%37.00%-25.63%5.94%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
11.06%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SGDJ and VT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2015

0.28

The correlation between SGDJ and VT shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SGDJ vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SGDJ
VT

Basic Materials

100.0%
4.2%

Communication Services

-

8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Energy

-

4.3%

Financial Services

-

15.9%

Healthcare

-

8.1%

Industrials

-

12.0%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Technology

-

27.8%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Basic Materials

SGDJ
100.0%
VT
4.2%

Communication Services

SGDJ

-

VT
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SGDJ

-

VT
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

SGDJ

-

VT
4.8%

Energy

SGDJ

-

VT
4.3%

Financial Services

SGDJ

-

VT
15.9%

Healthcare

SGDJ

-

VT
8.1%

Industrials

SGDJ

-

VT
12.0%

Real Estate

SGDJ

-

VT
2.4%

Technology

SGDJ

-

VT
27.8%

Utilities

SGDJ

-

VT
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGDJ vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGDJ
SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGDJ vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGDJVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

2.68

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.04

11.67

-6.63

SGDJ vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGDJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGDJ and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGDJ vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGDJ drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDJ and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGDJVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-50.27%

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.84%

-9.67%

-27.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.84%

-16.51%

-20.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.66%

-26.38%

-26.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.27%

-34.24%

-25.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.23%

-1.92%

-29.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.25%

-7.01%

-19.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.57%

2.22%

+11.35%

Volatility

SGDJ vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) has a higher volatility of 17.17% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 5.26%. This indicates that SGDJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGDJVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.17%

5.26%

+11.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.94%

11.01%

+30.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.96%

13.38%

+36.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.69%

16.15%

+24.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.92%

17.27%

+23.65%

SGDJ vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGDJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGDJ vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.88%, more than VT's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
8.88%8.37%6.55%4.55%2.46%2.20%1.97%0.65%0.00%0.14%1.77%0.85%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.61%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGDJ and VT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGDJ has higher volatility (17.17%) compared to VT (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDJ dropped -59.27% vs VT's -50.27%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.93% vs 10.80% for SGDJ. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.93% return vs 10.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDJ.

SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 8.88%, compared with 1.61% for VT.

SGDJ is categorized as Gold, while VT is Global Equities. SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGDJ and 0.06% for VT.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGDJ and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer