PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGDJ vs. SILJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGDJ vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGDJ achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's 6.61% return. Over the past 10 years, SGDJ has outperformed SILJ with an annualized return of 11.97%, while SILJ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.


SGDJ

1D
-3.43%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.97%
6M
12.36%
1Y
80.74%
3Y*
49.76%
5Y*
17.17%
10Y*
11.97%

SILJ

1D
-5.24%
1M
2.57%
YTD
6.61%
6M
16.40%
1Y
111.95%
3Y*
47.77%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGDJ vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
1.97%174.44%19.35%6.66%-27.60%-15.12%47.91%37.00%-25.63%5.94%
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
6.61%183.89%6.39%-5.21%-15.42%-23.21%33.00%57.06%-27.95%-5.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SGDJ and SILJ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2015

0.87

The correlation between SGDJ and SILJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SGDJ vs. SILJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SGDJ
SILJ

Basic Materials

100.0%
99.8%

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.2%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

SGDJ
100.0%
SILJ
99.8%

Communication Services

SGDJ

-

SILJ
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SGDJ

-

SILJ

-

Consumer Defensive

SGDJ

-

SILJ
0.2%

Energy

SGDJ

-

SILJ

-

Financial Services

SGDJ

-

SILJ
0.3%

Healthcare

SGDJ

-

SILJ

-

Industrials

SGDJ

-

SILJ

-

Real Estate

SGDJ

-

SILJ

-

Technology

SGDJ

-

SILJ

-

Utilities

SGDJ

-

SILJ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGDJ vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGDJ
SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

SILJ
SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGDJ vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGDJSILJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.32

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

3.24

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.48

7.99

-1.51

SGDJ vs. SILJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGDJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the SILJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGDJ and SILJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGDJSILJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

2.05

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.30

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.22

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.09

+0.27

Drawdowns

SGDJ vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGDJ drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDJ and SILJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGDJSILJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-79.04%

+19.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.22%

-34.71%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.22%

-34.71%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.90%

-55.47%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.27%

-70.06%

+10.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.66%

-26.80%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.25%

-41.43%

+15.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.50%

14.06%

-1.56%

Volatility

SGDJ vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) is 13.18%, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 18.69%. This indicates that SGDJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGDJSILJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.18%

18.69%

-5.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.87%

45.24%

-5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.34%

54.90%

-6.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.28%

44.35%

-4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.74%

46.24%

-5.50%

SGDJ vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGDJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGDJ vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison

SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, more than SILJ's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
8.21%8.37%6.55%4.55%2.46%2.20%1.97%0.65%0.00%0.14%1.77%0.85%
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
1.88%2.00%7.26%0.01%0.05%0.36%1.23%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.52%2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGDJ and SILJ have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SILJ has higher volatility (18.69%) compared to SGDJ (13.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDJ dropped -59.27% vs SILJ's -79.04%.

On 10-year performance, SGDJ leads with 11.97% vs 10.08% for SILJ. On fees, SGDJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SGDJ has been the lower-risk option at 13.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SGDJ has performed better with a 11.97% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGDJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.

SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 8.21%, compared with 1.88% for SILJ.

SGDJ is categorized as Materials, while SILJ is Silver. SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGDJ and 0.69% for SILJ.

SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGDJ and SILJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer