SGDJ vs. SILJ
SGDJ (Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGDJ is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGDJ returned 11.97%/yr vs 10.08%/yr for SILJ. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SGDJ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.
Performance
SGDJ vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGDJ achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's 6.61% return. Over the past 10 years, SGDJ has outperformed SILJ with an annualized return of 11.97%, while SILJ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.
SGDJ
- 1D
- -3.43%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 12.36%
- 1Y
- 80.74%
- 3Y*
- 49.76%
- 5Y*
- 17.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
SILJ
- 1D
- -5.24%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 16.40%
- 1Y
- 111.95%
- 3Y*
- 47.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
SGDJ vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | 1.97% | 174.44% | 19.35% | 6.66% | -27.60% | -15.12% | 47.91% | 37.00% | -25.63% | 5.94% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 6.61% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -23.21% | 33.00% | 57.06% | -27.95% | -5.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGDJ and SILJ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2015 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SGDJ and SILJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
SGDJ vs. SILJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SGDJ
SILJ
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
SGDJ
SILJ
Communication Services
SGDJ
-
SILJ
Consumer Cyclical
SGDJ
-
SILJ
-
Consumer Defensive
SGDJ
-
SILJ
Energy
SGDJ
-
SILJ
-
Financial Services
SGDJ
-
SILJ
Healthcare
SGDJ
-
SILJ
-
Industrials
SGDJ
-
SILJ
-
Real Estate
SGDJ
-
SILJ
-
Technology
SGDJ
-
SILJ
-
Utilities
SGDJ
-
SILJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGDJ vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
SGDJ
SILJ
SGDJ vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGDJ | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.32 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 3.24 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.48 | 7.99 | -1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGDJ | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 2.05 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.30 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.22 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.09 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
SGDJ vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGDJ drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDJ and SILJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGDJ | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -79.04% | +19.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.22% | -34.71% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.22% | -34.71% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.90% | -55.47% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.27% | -70.06% | +10.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.66% | -26.80% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.25% | -41.43% | +15.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.50% | 14.06% | -1.56% |
Volatility
SGDJ vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) is 13.18%, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 18.69%. This indicates that SGDJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGDJ | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.18% | 18.69% | -5.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.87% | 45.24% | -5.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.34% | 54.90% | -6.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.28% | 44.35% | -4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.74% | 46.24% | -5.50% |
SGDJ vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGDJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGDJ vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, more than SILJ's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | 8.21% | 8.37% | 6.55% | 4.55% | 2.46% | 2.20% | 1.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.77% | 0.85% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 1.88% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGDJ and SILJ have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SILJ has higher volatility (18.69%) compared to SGDJ (13.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDJ dropped -59.27% vs SILJ's -79.04%.
On 10-year performance, SGDJ leads with 11.97% vs 10.08% for SILJ. On fees, SGDJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SGDJ has been the lower-risk option at 13.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SGDJ has performed better with a 11.97% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGDJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.
SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 8.21%, compared with 1.88% for SILJ.
SGDJ is categorized as Materials, while SILJ is Silver. SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGDJ and 0.69% for SILJ.
SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGDJ and SILJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer