PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGDJ vs. IMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGDJ vs. IMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGDJ achieves a -5.68% return, which is significantly lower than IMOM's 16.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SGDJ has outperformed IMOM with an annualized return of 10.80%, while IMOM has yielded a comparatively lower 7.94% annualized return.


SGDJ

1D
2.43%
1M
-11.96%
YTD
-5.68%
6M
-2.07%
1Y
66.21%
3Y*
47.78%
5Y*
15.18%
10Y*
10.80%

IMOM

1D
1.30%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
16.29%
6M
18.55%
1Y
39.37%
3Y*
23.40%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
7.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGDJ vs. IMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
-5.68%174.44%19.35%6.66%-27.60%-15.12%47.91%37.00%-25.63%5.94%
IMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
16.29%47.20%5.22%9.15%-21.92%-0.75%28.39%18.26%-23.07%34.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SGDJ and IMOM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.32

Over the past year, SGDJ and IMOM have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.

SGDJ vs. IMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SGDJ
IMOM

Basic Materials

100.0%
14.5%

Communication Services

-

6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

10.3%

Financial Services

-

4.2%

Healthcare

-

3.3%

Industrials

-

31.2%

Real Estate

-

4.2%

Technology

-

18.7%

Utilities

-

10.7%

Basic Materials

SGDJ
100.0%
IMOM
14.5%

Communication Services

SGDJ

-

IMOM
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SGDJ

-

IMOM
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

SGDJ

-

IMOM

-

Energy

SGDJ

-

IMOM
10.3%

Financial Services

SGDJ

-

IMOM
4.2%

Healthcare

SGDJ

-

IMOM
3.3%

Industrials

SGDJ

-

IMOM
31.2%

Real Estate

SGDJ

-

IMOM
4.2%

Technology

SGDJ

-

IMOM
18.7%

Utilities

SGDJ

-

IMOM
10.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGDJ vs. IMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGDJ
SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

IMOM
IMOM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGDJ vs. IMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGDJIMOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

2.52

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.04

10.23

-5.19

SGDJ vs. IMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGDJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the IMOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGDJ and IMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGDJ vs. IMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGDJ drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than IMOM's maximum drawdown of -45.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDJ and IMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGDJIMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-45.74%

-13.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.84%

-15.61%

-21.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.84%

-17.51%

-19.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.66%

-39.27%

-13.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.27%

-45.74%

-13.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.23%

-3.90%

-27.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.25%

-14.15%

-12.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.57%

3.84%

+9.73%

Volatility

SGDJ vs. IMOM - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) has a higher volatility of 17.17% compared to Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) at 8.31%. This indicates that SGDJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGDJIMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.17%

8.31%

+8.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.94%

17.95%

+23.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.96%

20.49%

+29.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.69%

20.04%

+20.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.92%

20.30%

+20.62%

SGDJ vs. IMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGDJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IMOM's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGDJ vs. IMOM - Dividend Comparison

SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.88%, more than IMOM's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
2.17%2.53%4.52%2.95%6.06%1.27%0.59%1.17%0.78%1.11%0.54%0.00%
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
8.88%8.37%6.55%4.55%2.46%2.20%1.97%0.65%0.00%0.14%1.77%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGDJ and IMOM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGDJ has higher volatility (17.17%) compared to IMOM (8.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDJ dropped -59.27% vs IMOM's -45.74%.

On 10-year performance, SGDJ leads with 10.80% vs 7.94% for IMOM. On fees, IMOM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IMOM has been the lower-risk option at 8.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SGDJ has performed better with a 10.80% return vs 7.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMOM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDJ.

SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 8.88%, compared with 2.17% for IMOM.

SGDJ is categorized as Gold, while IMOM is Momentum. SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while IMOM tracks Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR). They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGDJ and 0.38% for IMOM.

IMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGDJ and IMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer