PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGDJ vs. DGZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGDJ vs. DGZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGDJ achieves a -5.38% return, which is significantly lower than DGZ's 13.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SGDJ has outperformed DGZ with an annualized return of 10.08%, while DGZ has yielded a comparatively lower -7.12% annualized return.


SGDJ

1D
-5.01%
1M
-6.84%
YTD
-5.38%
6M
-10.31%
1Y
72.25%
3Y*
50.80%
5Y*
17.28%
10Y*
10.08%

DGZ

1D
4.60%
1M
27.91%
YTD
13.79%
6M
21.33%
1Y
-7.69%
3Y*
-14.24%
5Y*
-9.28%
10Y*
-7.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGDJ vs. DGZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
-5.38%174.44%19.35%6.66%-27.60%-15.12%47.91%37.00%-25.63%5.94%
DGZ
DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes
13.79%-32.55%-16.46%-4.75%4.93%1.53%-20.80%-13.42%4.88%-11.36%

Correlation

The correlation between SGDJ and DGZ is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2015

-0.57

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SGDJ and DGZ has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.57 to -0.32, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGDJ vs. DGZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGDJ
SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

DGZ
DGZ Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
DGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGDJ vs. DGZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGDJDGZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.05

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

-0.20

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.11

-0.35

+5.46

SGDJ vs. DGZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGDJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the DGZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGDJ and DGZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGDJ vs. DGZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGDJ drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, smaller than the maximum DGZ drawdown of -86.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDJ and DGZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGDJDGZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-86.32%

+27.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.84%

-38.32%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.84%

-59.54%

+22.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.66%

-61.54%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.27%

-71.49%

+12.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.02%

-80.51%

+49.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.25%

-57.80%

+31.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.18%

22.24%

-8.06%

Volatility

SGDJ vs. DGZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) is 18.68%, while DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) has a volatility of 45.91%. This indicates that SGDJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGDJDGZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.68%

45.91%

-27.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.77%

58.66%

-15.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.78%

69.62%

-18.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.87%

36.50%

+4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.96%

28.17%

+12.79%

SGDJ vs. DGZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGDJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DGZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGDJ vs. DGZ - Dividend Comparison

SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.85%, while DGZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGZ
DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
8.85%8.37%6.55%4.55%2.46%2.20%1.97%0.65%0.00%0.14%1.77%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGDJ and DGZ have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGZ has higher volatility (45.91%) compared to SGDJ (18.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDJ dropped -59.27% vs DGZ's -86.32%.

On 10-year performance, SGDJ leads with 10.08% vs -7.12% for DGZ. On fees, SGDJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SGDJ has been the lower-risk option at 18.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SGDJ has performed better with a 10.08% return vs -7.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGDJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DGZ.

SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 8.85%, compared with 0.00% for DGZ.

SGDJ is categorized as Gold, while DGZ is Inverse Commodities. SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while DGZ tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index - Optimum Yield Gold Excess Return (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGDJ and 0.75% for DGZ.

SGDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGDJ and DGZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer