SGDJ vs. BAR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SGDJ (Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF) and BAR (GraniteShares Gold Trust) are both Gold funds - SGDJ tracks the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index while BAR tracks the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGDJ returned 17.28%/yr vs 18.08%/yr for BAR. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SGDJ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for BAR.

Performance

SGDJ vs. BAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGDJ achieves a -5.38% return, which is significantly lower than BAR's -4.82% return.

SGDJ

• 1D: -5.01%
• 1M: -6.84%
• YTD: -5.38%
• 6M: -10.31%
• 1Y: 72.25%
• 3Y*: 50.80%
• 5Y*: 17.28%
• 10Y*: 10.08%

BAR

• 1D: -1.94%
• 1M: -8.92%
• YTD: -4.82%
• 6M: -8.73%
• 1Y: 21.40%
• 3Y*: 28.63%
• 5Y*: 18.08%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGDJ vs. BAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF	-5.38%	174.44%	19.35%	6.66%	-27.60%	-15.12%	47.91%	37.00%	-25.63%	-5.38%
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust	-4.82%	64.12%	26.97%	12.96%	-0.55%	-3.92%	25.02%	18.16%	-1.87%	-0.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SGDJ and BAR is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2017	0.75

The correlation between SGDJ and BAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SGDJ vs. BAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGDJ

SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 39
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 35

BAR

BAR Risk / Return Rank: 22
BAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
BAR Omega Ratio Rank: 25
BAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
BAR Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGDJ vs. BAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SGDJ	BAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	0.78	+0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	1.14	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.17	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	0.88	+1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.11	2.37	+2.75

SGDJ vs. BAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGDJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the BAR Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGDJ and BAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SGDJ vs. BAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGDJ drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than BAR's maximum drawdown of -24.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDJ and BAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGDJ	BAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.27%	-24.38%	-34.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.84%	-24.38%	-12.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.84%	-24.38%	-12.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.66%	-24.38%	-28.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.02%	-23.93%	-7.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.25%	-6.53%	-19.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.18%	9.07%	+5.11%

Volatility

SGDJ vs. BAR - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) has a higher volatility of 18.68% compared to GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) at 8.11%. This indicates that SGDJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGDJ	BAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.68%	8.11%	+10.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.77%	24.24%	+18.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.78%	27.39%	+23.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.87%	18.14%	+22.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.96%	16.54%	+24.42%

SGDJ vs. BAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGDJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BAR's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGDJ vs. BAR - Dividend Comparison

SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.85%, while BAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF	8.85%	8.37%	6.55%	4.55%	2.46%	2.20%	1.97%	0.65%	0.00%	0.14%	1.77%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGDJ and BAR in my portfolio?

SGDJ and BAR have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SGDJ or BAR?

SGDJ has higher volatility (18.68%) compared to BAR (8.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDJ dropped -59.27% vs BAR's -24.38%.

Which ETF is better, SGDJ or BAR?

On 5-year performance, BAR leads with 18.08% vs 17.28% for SGDJ. On fees, BAR is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, BAR has been the lower-risk option at 8.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SGDJ or BAR?

Over the 5-year period, BAR has performed better with a 18.08% return vs 17.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SGDJ or BAR?

BAR is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SGDJ or BAR?

SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 8.85%, compared with 0.00% for BAR.

What is the main difference between SGDJ and BAR?

SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while BAR tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Sprott and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGDJ and 0.17% for BAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SGDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.