SGBX.L vs. RMAP.L
SGBX.L (WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold) and RMAP.L (HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC) are both Gold funds tracking the Gold, from WisdomTree and HANetf respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGBX.L returned 18.75%/yr vs 18.63%/yr for RMAP.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SGBX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for RMAP.L.
Performance
SGBX.L vs. RMAP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SGBX.L having a -4.89% return and RMAP.L slightly lower at -5.00%.
SGBX.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -9.19%
- YTD
- -4.89%
- 6M
- -8.27%
- 1Y
- 24.71%
- 3Y*
- 26.03%
- 5Y*
- 18.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
RMAP.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -9.14%
- YTD
- -5.00%
- 6M
- -8.44%
- 1Y
- 24.57%
- 3Y*
- 25.90%
- 5Y*
- 18.63%
- 10Y*
- —
SGBX.L vs. RMAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGBX.L WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold | -4.89% | 53.55% | 28.13% | 7.24% | 11.79% | -2.88% | 14.70% |
RMAP.L HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC | -5.00% | 53.50% | 27.99% | 7.09% | 11.74% | -2.96% | -12.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGBX.L and RMAP.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2020 | 0.98 |
The correlation between SGBX.L and RMAP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGBX.L vs. RMAP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGBX.L
RMAP.L
SGBX.L vs. RMAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold (SGBX.L) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGBX.L | RMAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.94 | 2.94 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGBX.L vs. RMAP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGBX.L drawdown since its inception was -53.66%, which is greater than RMAP.L's maximum drawdown of -24.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGBX.L and RMAP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGBX.L | RMAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.66% | -24.37% | -29.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.41% | -23.34% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.41% | -23.34% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.41% | -23.34% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.31% | -23.27% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -9.27% | -16.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.37% | 8.34% | +0.03% |
Volatility
SGBX.L vs. RMAP.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold (SGBX.L) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L) have volatilities of 8.06% and 8.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGBX.L | RMAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 8.09% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.08% | 21.09% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.01% | 23.97% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 21.78% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 22.61% | -3.37% |
SGBX.L vs. RMAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGBX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RMAP.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SGBX.L vs. RMAP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGBX.L nor RMAP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, SGBX.L and RMAP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SGBX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGBX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for RMAP.L.
Both ETFs track Gold. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SGBX.L and 0.22% for RMAP.L.
Find the right allocation for SGBX.L and RMAP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer