SFYX vs. IWR
SFYX (SoFi Next 500 ETF) and IWR (iShares Russell Midcap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - SFYX tracks the Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index while IWR tracks the Russell Midcap Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFYX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWR.
Performance
SFYX vs. IWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SFYX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWR
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 12.21%
- 1Y
- 21.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 8.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
SFYX vs. IWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF | 5.66% | 14.25% | 14.45% | 17.70% | -22.88% | 18.89% | 17.63% | 6.95% |
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 12.43% | 10.37% | 15.21% | 17.05% | -17.48% | 22.44% | 16.93% | 9.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFYX and IWR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SFYX and IWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SFYX vs. IWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFYX
IWR
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
SFYX
IWR
Technology
SFYX
IWR
Financial Services
SFYX
IWR
Healthcare
SFYX
IWR
Consumer Cyclical
SFYX
IWR
Real Estate
SFYX
IWR
Communication Services
SFYX
IWR
Energy
SFYX
IWR
Basic Materials
SFYX
IWR
Consumer Defensive
SFYX
IWR
Utilities
SFYX
IWR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFYX vs. IWR — Risk / Return Rank
SFYX
IWR
SFYX vs. IWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFYX | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.49 | — |
Drawdowns
SFYX vs. IWR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFYX | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -58.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.26% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.80% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.11% | — |
Volatility
SFYX vs. IWR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFYX | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 13.39% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 18.23% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 19.36% | — |
SFYX vs. IWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFYX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than IWR's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SFYX vs. IWR - Dividend Comparison
SFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than IWR's 1.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.15% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.98% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.59% |
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF | 1.36% | 1.44% | 1.25% | 1.51% | 1.56% | 0.90% | 1.16% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFYX and IWR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SFYX is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SFYX is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWR.
SFYX has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.15% for IWR.
SFYX tracks Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index, while IWR tracks Russell Midcap Index. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SFYX and 0.19% for IWR.
Find the right allocation for SFYX and IWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer