SFYI vs. AEMS

Last updated Jul 29, 2026

SFYI (SoFi Social 50 Income ETF) and AEMS (Anfield Enhanced Market ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SFYI charges 0.73%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for AEMS.

Performance

SFYI vs. AEMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Social 50 Income ETF (SFYI) and Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SFYI

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

AEMS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.78%
• 6M: 10.75%
• YTD: 14.93%
• 1Y: 25.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 26.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	$0.00	$164.75K	$3.05M
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF	$69.84K	$123.60K	$123.60K

SFYI vs. AEMS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF	-4.88%
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	-1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SFYI and AEMS is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026	0.05

Return for Risk

SFYI vs. AEMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFYI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AEMS

AEMS Risk / Return Rank: 57
AEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
AEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
AEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 60
AEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
AEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFYI vs. AEMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 Income ETF (SFYI) and Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SFYI	AEMS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.25	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.81	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.26	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.23	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.43	—

Drawdowns

SFYI vs. AEMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFYI drawdown since its inception was -6.33%, smaller than the maximum AEMS drawdown of -11.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYI and AEMS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFYI	AEMS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.33%	-11.37%	+5.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.02%	-8.91%	+2.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.53%	-1.95%	-0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.41%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SFYI	AEMS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.37%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.71%	20.34%	-3.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.71%	19.71%	-3.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.71%	19.71%	-3.00%

SFYI vs. AEMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFYI has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than AEMS's 1.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFYI vs. AEMS - Dividend Comparison

SFYI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 447.11%.

Position	TTM	2025
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	447.11%	7.53%
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFYI and AEMS in my portfolio?

SFYI and AEMS have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SFYI or AEMS?

On fees, SFYI is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SFYI or AEMS?

SFYI is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for AEMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SFYI or AEMS?

AEMS has the higher dividend yield at 447.11%, compared with 0.00% for SFYI.

What is the main difference between SFYI and AEMS?

They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Anfield. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for SFYI and 1.21% for AEMS.