PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFYF vs. SPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFYF vs. SPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and Robinson Alternative Yield Pre-merger SPAC ETF (SPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SFYF

1D
-0.04%
1M
8.49%
YTD
14.80%
6M
13.77%
1Y
44.18%
3Y*
36.16%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*

SPAX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFYF vs. SPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
14.80%30.00%44.62%56.80%-47.73%-3.61%
SPAX
Robinson Alternative Yield Pre-merger SPAC ETF
0.00%0.02%5.11%6.63%1.25%2.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SFYF and SPAX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021

0.03

SFYF vs. SPAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SFYF
SPAX

Technology

38.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

22.9%

-

Communication Services

13.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.8%

-

Financial Services

5.5%
100.0%

Healthcare

5.5%

-

Industrials

3.5%

-

Energy

2.1%

-

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

SFYF
38.5%
SPAX

-

Consumer Cyclical

SFYF
22.9%
SPAX

-

Communication Services

SFYF
13.8%
SPAX

-

Consumer Defensive

SFYF
6.8%
SPAX

-

Financial Services

SFYF
5.5%
SPAX
100.0%

Healthcare

SFYF
5.5%
SPAX

-

Industrials

SFYF
3.5%
SPAX

-

Energy

SFYF
2.1%
SPAX

-

Real Estate

SFYF
1.2%
SPAX

-

Basic Materials

SFYF

-

SPAX

-

Utilities

SFYF

-

SPAX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFYF vs. SPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFYF
SFYF Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SFYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFYF Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SFYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFYF Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SPAX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFYF vs. SPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and Robinson Alternative Yield Pre-merger SPAC ETF (SPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFYFSPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

SFYF vs. SPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFYFSPAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

Drawdowns

SFYF vs. SPAX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFYFSPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

Volatility

SFYF vs. SPAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFYFSPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.67%

SFYF vs. SPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFYF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SPAX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFYF vs. SPAX - Dividend Comparison

SFYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while SPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
0.29%0.33%0.31%1.71%1.19%0.26%0.40%0.73%
SPAX
Robinson Alternative Yield Pre-merger SPAC ETF
0.00%0.00%5.50%7.54%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFYF and SPAX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SFYF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SFYF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SPAX.

SFYF has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for SPAX.

SFYF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPAX is Event Driven. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SFYF and 0.85% for SPAX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFYF and SPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer