SFY vs. RPG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SFY (SoFi Select 500 ETF) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SFY tracks the Solactive SoFi US 500 Growth Index while RPG tracks the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SFY returned 14.38%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for RPG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFY charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.

Performance

SFY vs. RPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFY achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 30.55% return.

SFY

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: 10.42%
• 6M: 8.95%
• 1Y: 27.16%
• 3Y*: 25.26%
• 5Y*: 14.38%
• 10Y*: —

RPG

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 5.68%
• YTD: 30.55%
• 6M: 27.48%
• 1Y: 36.38%
• 3Y*: 27.80%
• 5Y*: 11.61%
• 10Y*: 15.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFY vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF	10.42%	22.67%	29.81%	29.36%	-22.84%	28.03%	24.52%	13.72%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	30.55%	13.41%	28.23%	8.04%	-27.55%	29.40%	29.34%	8.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SFY and RPG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019	0.90

The correlation between SFY and RPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SFY vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SFY	RPG
Technology	44.0%	46.9%
Financial Services	11.1%	5.3%
Healthcare	10.6%	6.4%
Communication Services	9.8%	5.4%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	14.7%
Industrials	6.0%	14.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	1.1%
Utilities	2.1%	2.4%
Energy	2.0%	1.6%
Basic Materials	1.6%	1.2%
Real Estate	1.5%	1.0%

Return for Risk

SFY vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFY

SFY Risk / Return Rank: 58
SFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
SFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SFY Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SFY Martin Ratio Rank: 64

RPG

RPG Risk / Return Rank: 61
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFY vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SFY	RPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.66	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	2.26	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.30	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	3.30	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.42	12.38	-1.96

SFY vs. RPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFY Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the RPG Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFY and RPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SFY vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFY drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, smaller than the maximum RPG drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFY and RPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFY	RPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.25%	-53.27%	+20.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.79%	-11.08%	+0.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.04%	-24.75%	+3.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.72%	-35.59%	+7.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.56%	-4.43%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-8.83%	+2.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	2.95%	-0.34%

Volatility

SFY vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) is 6.87%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 11.10%. This indicates that SFY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SFY	RPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.87%	11.10%	-4.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.44%	18.98%	-6.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.61%	22.06%	-6.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.21%	23.86%	-4.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.25%	22.89%	-2.64%

SFY vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFY has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFY vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison

SFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than RPG's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	0.15%	0.24%	0.25%	1.44%	0.74%	0.00%	0.46%	0.83%	0.47%	0.56%	0.43%	0.73%
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF	0.87%	0.96%	0.99%	1.40%	1.61%	0.90%	1.18%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFY and RPG in my portfolio?

SFY and RPG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SFY or RPG?

RPG has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to SFY (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFY dropped -33.25% vs RPG's -53.27%.

Which ETF is better, SFY or RPG?

On 5-year performance, SFY leads with 14.38% vs 11.61% for RPG. On fees, SFY is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, SFY has been the lower-risk option at 6.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SFY or RPG?

Over the 5-year period, SFY has performed better with a 14.38% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SFY or RPG?

SFY is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SFY or RPG?

SFY has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.15% for RPG.

What is the main difference between SFY and RPG?

SFY tracks Solactive SoFi US 500 Growth Index, while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: SoFi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SFY and 0.35% for RPG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SFY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.