PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFY vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFY vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFY achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 7.55% return.


SFY

1D
0.21%
1M
6.84%
YTD
14.75%
6M
14.54%
1Y
35.47%
3Y*
27.66%
5Y*
15.91%
10Y*

QUS

1D
0.83%
1M
3.04%
YTD
7.55%
6M
7.92%
1Y
18.69%
3Y*
17.98%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*
13.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFY vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SFY
SoFi Select 500 ETF
14.75%22.67%29.81%29.36%-22.84%28.03%24.52%13.38%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
7.55%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.72%12.40%14.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SFY and QUS is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

0.89

The correlation between SFY and QUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SFY vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SFY
QUS

Technology

45.5%
26.3%

Communication Services

10.2%
10.2%

Financial Services

9.6%
14.6%

Healthcare

9.4%
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
5.8%

Industrials

6.7%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
9.2%

Energy

2.4%
4.6%

Utilities

1.9%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.3%

Technology

SFY
45.5%
QUS
26.3%

Communication Services

SFY
10.2%
QUS
10.2%

Financial Services

SFY
9.6%
QUS
14.6%

Healthcare

SFY
9.4%
QUS
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SFY
7.6%
QUS
5.8%

Industrials

SFY
6.7%
QUS
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

SFY
3.4%
QUS
9.2%

Energy

SFY
2.4%
QUS
4.6%

Utilities

SFY
1.9%
QUS
3.6%

Real Estate

SFY
1.7%
QUS
1.4%

Basic Materials

SFY
1.7%
QUS
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFY vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFY
SFY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFY vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFYQUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.37

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

2.74

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.42

12.22

+2.20

SFY vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFY Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFY and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFYQUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.06

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.79

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.78

+0.13

Drawdowns

SFY vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFY drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, roughly equal to the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFY and QUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFYQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.25%

-33.78%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-6.85%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.04%

-13.94%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.72%

-22.30%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

0.00%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-3.70%

-2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

1.53%

+0.94%

Volatility

SFY vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.88%. This indicates that SFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFYQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

1.88%

+2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.09%

6.70%

+4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

9.12%

+5.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.01%

14.33%

+4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

16.42%

+3.77%

SFY vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFY has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SFY vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

SFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than QUS's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.30%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%
SFY
SoFi Select 500 ETF
0.84%0.96%0.99%1.40%1.61%0.90%1.18%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFY and QUS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFY has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to QUS (1.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFY dropped -33.25% vs QUS's -33.78%.

On 5-year performance, SFY leads with 15.91% vs 11.26% for QUS. On fees, SFY is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SFY has performed better with a 15.91% return vs 11.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SFY is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUS.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.84% for SFY.

SFY tracks Solactive SoFi US 500 Growth Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SFY and 0.15% for QUS.

SFY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFY and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer